PREMIER POULTRY PRODUCTS PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT-5(1), HYDERABAD
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. Consequently, the appeal filed by the assessee was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act for the Assessment Year 2015-16. The assessee later filed an application seeking withdrawal of the appeal.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the assessee's appeal against the Section 263 order should be allowed to be withdrawn.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad ‘B‘ Bench, Hyderabad
Before: Shri R.K. Panda, Vice- & Shri Laliet Kumar
आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण, हैदराबाद पीठ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Hyderabad ‘B‘ Bench, Hyderabad Before Shri R.K. Panda, Vice-President AND Shri Laliet Kumar, Judicial Member Assessment Year: 2015-16 Premier Poultry Products Vs. Dy.CIT, Circle 5(1) (P) Ltd, Hyderabad Hyderabad PAN:AACCP0922F (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by: Shri M.V. Anil Kumar, CA Revenue by: Shri Jeevan Lal Lavidiya, CIT(DR) Date of hearing: 13/07/2023 Date of pronouncement: 13/07/2023 ORDER
Per R.K. Panda, Vice-President
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 25.03.2021 passed u/s 263 of the I.T. Act, 1961 by the learned Pr.CIT-4, Hyderabad for the A.Y 2015-16.
The learned Counsel for the assessee at the time of hearing filed an application seeking withdrawal of the appeal for which the learned DR has no objection. Accordingly, the request of the assessee seeking withdrawal of the appeal is allowed and the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed.
ITA 190 of 2021 Premier Poultry Products
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Akshaya Consortium vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Dipanshu Aggarwal vs. Director General Of GST IntelligenceDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Dezinetree Projects PVT. LTD. vs. Spokes Digital Inc And AnrDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Jaydeep Jayantilal Hudaka vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 28 Oct 2026
- Commissioner/Additional Commissioner Of Central Tax vs. M/S INDIA Agro Exports Private LimitedKarnataka · 28 Oct 2026