BIPIN KUMAR,MUZAFFARPUR vs. ITO, VAISHALI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the CIT(Appeals) did not follow the prescribed procedure and the Assessing Officer passed an ex-parte order. Therefore, both orders were set aside for a fresh assessment.
What were the facts?
The assessee failed to file an income tax return. The Assessing Officer, based on information of cash deposits in bank accounts, passed an ex-parte assessment order. The CIT(Appeals) dismissed the assessee's appeal for want of prosecution.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(Appeals) followed the proper procedure in dismissing the appeal for want of prosecution, and whether the ex-parte assessment order was valid.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA-PATNA ‘e-COURT’, KOLKATA
Before: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-(KZ) & Dr. Manish Borad
Per Rajpal Yadav, Vice-President (KZ):- The present appeal is directed at the instance of assessee against the order of ld. Commissioner of Income
Assessment Year: 2017-2018 Bipin Kumar Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi dated 13th June, 2023 passed for A.Y. 2017-18.
In response to the notice of hearing, no one has come forward on behalf of the assessee. Shri Manish Rastogi, Advocate has filed a paper book containing 30 pages. We have perused those pages and proceed to decide the appeal on merit.
Brief facts of the case are that the assessee did not file his return of income and ld. Assessing Officer has got an information that the assessee has deposited cash of Rs.10,09,000/- and Rs.2,16,000/- in two Bank Accounts with Bank of India. He issued notice under section 142(1) inviting the return of the assessee, but assessee did not respond. Therefore, the ld. Assessing Officer has passed an ex-parte assessment order under section 144 on 20.11.2019. The ld. Assessing Officer has determined the taxable income of the assessee at Rs.8,91,112/-.
Dissatisfied with this assessment order, the assessee carried the matter in appeal before ld. CIT(Appeals). The ld. CIT(Appeals) has dismissed the appeal of the assessee for want of prosecution.
With the assistance of ld. D.R., we have gone through the record carefully. Sub-section 6 of Section Assessment Year: 2017-2018 Bipin Kumar 250 of the Income Tax Act contemplates that ld. 1st Appellate Authority would state the points in dispute and thereafter record the reasons on those points in support of his conclusion. This procedure has not been followed by the ld. 1st Appellate Authority. Apart from the above, ld. Assessing Officer has also passed an ex-parte assessment order. Therefore, we deem it proper to set aside both these orders and restore this issue to the file of ld. Assessing Officer for a de novo assessment order. The assessee will be at liberty to raise any fundamental issue even against issuance of a notice under section 142(1) of the Income Tax Act. The ld. Assessing Officer shall provide due opportunity of hearing to the assessee and thereafter pass the fresh assessment order.
In view of the above, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open Court on 24.01.2024.
More judgments on Section 142(1)
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Subhash Chand Saini, Jaipur vs ITO Ward, Behror, BherorITA 36/JPR/2023[2017-18]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Venish Vinodray Lalani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, MorbiITA 197/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Gaurav Jiteshbhai Joshi, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(1)(1), RajkotITA 1000/RJT/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- S. Nithyananda vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Ritik vs. State Of M.P.Madhya Pradesh · 16 Oct 2026
- Venkadeswara Grill Works vs. The Joint Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026