SAHU MAHABIR TRUST,DARBHANGA vs. CIT (E) PATNA, CIT (E) PATNA

Brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a public charitable trust doing charitable activity running eye hospital in the name of Mahavir Netrayalya for treatment of poor people and other charitable activities. The assessee trust made an application for provisional registration u/s 12A(1)(ac)(vi) for A.Y. 2021-22 to 2023- 24. Accordingly, provisional registration granted on 27.05.2021 to the assessee. The assessee trust has also made an application for regular registration u/s 12(A)(1)(ac)(iii) r.w.s. 12AB(1)(b) of the Act.

In the course of proceedings u/s 12AB notice was issued to the assessee requiring to submit certain documents and information such as notes on activities under taken by the trust during the last three years along with annual accounts and supporting evidence, bank statements, location detail etc. In compliance to the notice,

Aggrieved by the order of ld. CIT(E), assessee has preferred the appeal praying before the bench to set aside the impugned order with the direction to validate the continuation of registration of the assessee for A.Y. 2021-22 to 2023-24.

At the time of hearing, ld. AR stated that after registration of the supplementary trust deed with the sub-registrar, Darbhanga dated 04.11.2023. The assessee has again applied for regular registration on 06.11.2023 and the regular registration vide order dated 28.11.2023 from the A.Y. 2024-25 to 2028-29 has been allowed by ld. CIT(E). However, assessee still awaited for A.Y. 2021-22 to 2023- 24 since the application of the assessee was already set aside by CIT(E) vide order dated 12.01.2023. In such situation, it is necessary

We after hearing the submission of the parties and perused the material available on record find that assessee due to bona fide reason could not submit the supplementary deed and other documents as required by the I.T. department for granting regular registration of trust for getting benefit under the Act. Therefore, the claim of the assessee was turn down by CIT(E) by rejecting the application of the assessee trust, it is therefore necessary to remand back the whole issue to ld. CIT(E) with the direction to re-examine the issue afresh after affording reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee by obtaining necessary document from the assessee in relation with claim made by assessee. The assessee also directed to appear before the ld. CIT(E) as and when notice for such purposes issued by ld. CIT(E) that event assessee should appear before him without any fail. In terms of the above, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open court on 15.03.2024 Sd/- Sd/- (Dr. MANISH BORAD) (SONJOY SARMA) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Kolkata, Dated: 15.03.2024 Biswajit, Sr. P.S.