SHUBH LAXMI KRISHAK SEWA SWABLAMBI SAHKARI SAMITI LTD,HAJIPUR vs. ITO WARD 1(3), HAJIPUR

PDF · subscribers
ITA 370/PAT/2023Status: DisposedITAT Patna29 May 2024AY 2017-184 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal before the CIT(Appeals) and directed the CIT(Appeals) to decide the appeal on merits. The Tribunal found that the delay was not intentional and was caused by circumstances beyond the assessee's control.

What were the facts?

The assessee, a cooperative society, filed an appeal before the CIT(Appeals) which was dismissed as barred by limitation. The assessee contended that the delay was due to its office being closed during the COVID-19 pandemic and it received the assessment order only in January 2023.

What were the issues?

Whether the delay in filing the appeal before the CIT(Appeals) was justifiable due to the COVID-19 pandemic and other circumstances beyond the assessee's control.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA-PATNA ‘e-COURT’, KOLKATA

Before: Shri Sanjay Garg & Dr. Manish Borad

Per Sanjay Garg, Judicial Member:- The present appeal has been preferred by the assessee against the order of ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) dated 23rd November, 2023 for the assessment year 2017-18.

Shubh Laxmi Krishak Sewa Swablambi Sahkari Samiti Ltd.

2.

At the outset, the ld. Counsel for the assessee has invited our attention to the impugned order of the ld. CIT(Appeals). He has submitted that the ld. CIT(Appeals) has dismissed the appeal of the assessee on the ground that the same is barred by limitation. The ld. Counsel in this respect has filed written submission, wherein it has been explained that the assessee is a Registered Cooperative Society, which works for cooperation to the farmers for agriculture as per the aims and objects. It conducts its business on non-profitable mode. It has been submitted that the Office/business of the assessee was closed down due to COVID 19 Pandemic. It was opened only in the month of January, 2023 and only then the assessment order passed by the Income Tax Officer has been received by the assessee. That thereafter the first appeal has been filed on 16.02.2023 without any delay. That the delay caused in filing the appeal before the ld. CIT(Appeals) was not intentional, rather due to the fact that the assessee-Society works in a rural area on non- profit basis and due to the circumstances beyond the control of the assessee, the Office of the assessee remained closed. The appeal was filed immediately on coming to the notice of the assessee of passing of the impugned assessment order. The ld. Counsel has prayed that in the interest of justice, the assessee may be given an opportunity to present its case before the ld. CIT(Appeals).

3.

The ld. D.R., on the other hand, has relied upon the order of ld. CIT(Appeals).

4.

Considering the submissions made by the ld. Counsel for the assessee, as noted above, we are of the view that interest of justice will be well served if the assessee is given an opportunity to present its case on merit before the ld. CIT(Appeals). Accordingly, the impugned order of the ld. CIT(Appeals) is set aside. The delay in filing the appeal before the ld. CIT(Appeals) is hereby condoned and the ld. CIT(Appeals) is directed to decide the appeal of the assessee on merits after giving proper opportunity to the assessee to present its case.

5.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open Court on 29/05/2024.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →