THE JUNIOR ENGINEERS (TELECOM) COOPERATIVES CREDIT SOCIETY LTD.,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O., WARD - 11(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee had a genuine cause for the delay, which was beyond its control, and therefore, should not be penalized. The Assessing Officer was directed to grant the deduction under Section 80P.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a cooperative society, filed its return of income belatedly due to a delay by the Government Auditor in completing the audit. The lower authorities denied the deduction under Section 80P on the grounds of late filing.
What were the issues?
Whether the denial of deduction under Section 80P for late filing of return, when the delay was due to circumstances beyond the assessee's control, is justified.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” BENCH KOLKATA
Before: Shri Sanjay Garg & Dr. Manish Borad
order : February 06, 2023 आदेश / ORDER संजय गग�, �या�यक सद�य �वारा / Per Sanjay Garg, Judicial Member: The present appeal has been preferred by the assessee against the order dated 20.09.2022 of the National Faceless Appeal Centre [hereinafter referred to as the ‘CIT(A)’] passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’). 2. The assessee in this appeal has taken the following grounds of appeal: “1. For that Hon’ble CIT(A) erred in law as well as on facts in confirming the disallowance of the benefit of deduction u/s 80P for alleged late filing of return for no fault on the part of the assessee, which is not sustainable in the eye of law and needs to be deleted. Assessment year: 2018-19 The Junior Engineers (Telecom) Cooperatives Credit Society Ltd
2. The assessee craves leave for addition, deletion, alteration or modification any of the grounds before or at the time of hearing.”
3. The sole issue involved, in this issue, is relating to the denial of deduction u/s 80P of the Act to the assessee cooperative-society on the ground of delay in filing return of income.
4. At the outset, the ld. counsel for the assessee has submitted that the return was filed within the extended prescribed period as per provision of section 139(4) of the Act. However, the lower authorities have denied the deduction u/s 80P of the Act on the ground that as per section 80AC of the Act, the condition stipulated is that an assessee should have furnished his return of income on or before the due date as specified under sub-section (1) to section 139. The ld. counsel, in this respect, has submitted that the above condition of filing of the return on or before the specified date under sub-section (1) to section 139 has been introduced for the first time i.e. from 1st April 2018 relevant to assessment year under consideration. It has been further submitted that the assessee cooperative-society under the laws is required to get its accounts audited from a Government auditor. That the Government Auditor, despite of repeated reminders, made inordinate delay in completing the audit under the Cooperative Societies Act, which finally concluded on 17.12.2018 and was handed over to cooperative-society in a few days thereafter. The assessee cooperative-society immediately filed the return of income on 31.12.2018. That the delay, if any, occurred in non-filing of the return within the stipulated period as provided u/s 139(1) of the Act was due to circumstances which was beyond the control of the assessee cooperative-society. That the delay, if any, have occurred on the part of Government Auditor in completing the audit who was not under control of the assessee-society.
More judgments on Section 80P
- Shree Bandharda Seva Sahkari Mandli Ltd… vs Income Tax Officer Ward -4, JunagadhITA 881/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Duddukuru Primary Agricultural Cooperative… vs ITO, Ward - 1, TadepalligudemITA 258/VIZ/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Parthasaradhi Mutually Aided Co-Operative… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-17(1), HyderabadITA 2322/HYD/2026[AY 2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026
- Jijamata Mahila Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari… vs ITO Ward -1, BhandraITA 102/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Shri Na vs Ari Khedut Sahkari Society Ltd…ITA 362/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Redamancy World Through Its Proprietor Sanjay Kumar Goel vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Arj Exim INDIA vs. Additional Commissioner Of CGST, Appeals-Ii, New Delhi And OrsDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- The State Of Bihar Through The Commissioner Of State Tax vs. Kaushlendra KumarPatna · 27 Oct 2026
- Ayush Sureshchandra Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- Sureshchandra Moolchand Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026