SMT. PRITI A.DOSHI,KOLKATA vs. PR.CIT-12, KOLKATA
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and requested withdrawal of the appeal. The Revenue had no objection to this request.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order passed under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act. The assessee later opted for the 'Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020'.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn due to the assessee opting for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA ‘A” BENCH, KOLKATA
Before: SRI RAJPAL YADAV & DR. MANISH BORAD
order
: February 06th, 2023 ORDER
Per Manish Borad, Accountant Member:
This appeal filed by the assessee pertaining to the Assessment Year (in short “AY”) 2014-15 is directed against the order passed u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short the “Act”) by ld. Pr. CIT, Kolkata-12, Kolkata dated 29.03.2019.
I.T.A. No.: 960/KOL/2019 Assessment Year: 2014-15 Smt. Priti A. Doshi.
The ld. Counsel for the assessee has submitted that the assessee has availed the “Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020”. Form No.-3 has been issued by the Revenue authorities on 11.11.2020.
Per contra, ld. D/R did not have any objection to this request of the assessee.
We have heard rival contentions and perused the records placed before us. We have gone through the facts narrated by the ld. Counsel for the assessee stated herein above and find that the assessee has opted under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020 and requested for withdrawing the instant appeal. Revenue has no objection if the instant appeal is dismissed. We, therefore, dismiss this appeal as withdrawn.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Sahoo Supply Agency,Balasore vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs,New DelhiOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S Jyoti Consultants, Agrahat vs. Pr. Commissioner GST And Central Excise Commissionerate, BhubaneswarOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S. Sahoo Supply Agency vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And CustomsOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- Gopal Aromatic PVT. LTD., Cuttack vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S. Nourangi Paints vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 2 Nov 2026