B.B.D. BAG PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION (FORMERLY KNOWN AS B.B.D. BAG PROFESSIONAL STUDY CIRCLE ASSOCIATION),KOLKATA vs. CIT- EXEMPTION, KOLKATA, KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal held that principles of natural justice require the assessee to be given an opportunity to present its case. The impugned order was set aside, and the matter was restored to the CIT(Exemption) for a fresh decision.
What were the facts?
The assessee-association applied for registration under Section 80G of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(Exemption) passed an ex parte order without considering the assessee's adjournment application.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(Exemption) erred in passing an ex parte order without granting an opportunity to the assessee to present its case.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH KOLKATA
Before: Shri Sanjay Garg & Dr. Manish Borad
order : February 22, 2023 आदेश / ORDER संजय गग�, �या�यक सद�य �वारा / Per Sanjay Garg, Judicial Member: The present appeal has been preferred by the assessee against the order dated 22.09.2022 of the CIT(Exemption) [hereinafter referred to as the ‘CIT(E)’].
At the outset, the ld. Counsel for the assessee has submitted that the assessee-association moved an application for registration u/s 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’). That on the date of hearing, the assessee-association had moved an adjournment application to the ld. CIT(E). However, the ld. CIT(E) did not consider the same and passed the ex parte order. The ld. Counsel has submitted that Assessment year: 2022-23 B.B.D. Bag Professional Association the assessee-association may be given an opportunity to present its case before the CIT(E). We are of the view that the principles of natural justice will be well-served, if the assessee-association is given an opportunity to present its case before the CIT(E). In view of this, the impugned order of the CIT(E) is set aside and the matter is restored to the file of the CIT(E) for decision afresh. Needless to say that CIT(E) will give proper opportunity to the assessee to present its case.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes.
More judgments on Section 80G
- Savan Dayalal Ladani, Rajkot vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax-2(1)…ITA 575/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Pareshbhai Savjibhai Khunt, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer Ward - 2(2)(3), RajkotITA 842/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Fasil Hussain Shah vs. Ut Of J And K Th Commissioner Secretary TO Government Finance Department And OthersJammu and Kashmir and Ladakh · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S. Devkinandan Traders vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Dixit Medical Agencies vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- Sukant Kumar vs. Union Of INDIA And 6 OthersAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026