M/S. GURUJI MERCANTILE PVT. LTD,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD-6(2), KOLKATA
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CIT(Appeals) erred by introducing a new issue regarding lottery winnings and a different tax regime, without addressing the original dispute of the interest income addition. The CIT(Appeals) also lacked jurisdiction to consider this new issue without issuing a notice for enhancement.
What were the facts?
The assessee declared a total income of Rs.71,404, but the CPC adjusted it to Rs.6,36,267 by adding Rs.5,64,863, which was interest income from another company. The assessee contended that TDS was deducted on this interest and it was already included in their income from other sources.
What were the issues?
Whether the addition of Rs.5,64,863 as interest income was sustainable, and whether the CIT(Appeals) acted within jurisdiction by introducing a new issue regarding lottery winnings.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 139(1),Section 143(1),Section 154,Section 115BB,Section 58(4)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘SMC’ BENCH, KOLKATA
Before: Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice- & Shri Rajesh Kumar
Per Shri Rajpal Yadav, Vice-President (KZ):- The present appeal is directed at the instance of assessee against the order of ld. Commissioner of Income
Assessment Year : 2017-2018 M/s. Guruji Mercantile Pvt. Limited Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi dated 9th March, 2023 passed for assessment year 2017-18.
The assessee has taken six grounds of appeal. However, its grievance is that ld. CIT(Appeals) has erred in confirming the addition of Rs.5,64,863/- in the total income of the assessee.
Brief facts of the case are that the assessee has filed its return of income under section 139(1) of the Income Tax Act declaring total income of Rs.71,404/-. The CPC while exercising the powers under section 143(1) determined the total taxable income at Rs.6,36,267/-. In this adjustment, CPC has made an addition of Rs.5,64,863/-, which is an interest receipt from M/s. Mohan Impressions Pvt. Limited. According to the revenue, TDS was not deducted by the payer of the interest and, therefore, total interest income is to be included in the taxable income of the assessee. The assessee filed application contending therein that it has computed Rs.32,07,748/- under the head “income from other sources” and in this income, the interest received from M/s. Mohan Impressions Pvt. Limited has been included. The assessee has also placed on record the rectified Form 26AS exhibiting the fact that TDS was also made on this interest. The assessee has filed the Assessment Year : 2017-2018 M/s. Guruji Mercantile Pvt. Limited complete details of Form 26AS and how CPC has disallowed it while processing the return under section 143(1) and rejecting the application under section 154.
The ld. CIT(Appeals) while considering the contentions of the assessee has observed that the assessee has income from ‘Winnings from Lottery’ or ‘Crossword Puzzles’. According to him, section 115BB prescribes a different tax regime and tax is charged @ 30% flat. Apart from this, no deduction, allowance or loss is allowed to be set off against such income as per section 58(4) of the Act. Hence this Winning is taxed at a straight rate of 30%. In other words, instead of deciding the issue whether interest income from M/s. Mohan Impressions Pvt. Limited has to be included in the income from other source or not, ld. CIT(Appeals) has totally changed the colour by holding that all these aspects are to be ignored only gross income from Winnings of Lottery or ‘Crossword Puzzles’ are to be taxed @ 30%.
It is to be observed that this was not the subject matter of appeal and ld. CIT(Appeals) has not issued any notice for enhancement. If all these are to be looked into, then the case of the assessee ought to have been selected for scrutiny assessment. The dispute before us is, whether addition of Rs.5,64,863/- is sustainable or not.
Assessment Year : 2017-2018 M/s. Guruji Mercantile Pvt. Limited Instead of addressing this issue, ld. CIT(Appeals) went into altogether new issue and for that it has no jurisdiction. Therefore, we allow this appeal of the assessee and delete the addition made by the CPC. 6. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed. Order pronounced in the open Court on June 1st, 2023.
More judgments on Section 139(1)
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Haresh Sharma, Ahmedabad vs ITO, Ward 5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2125/AHD/2026[2019-2020]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2019-2020
- Nitinbhai Nanalal Badani, Rajkot vs CIT (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal…ITA 658/RJT/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Nitinbhai Nanalal Badani, Rajkot vs CIT(Appeals), National Faceless Appeal…ITA 485/RJT/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Mata Lachmi Rotary Charitable Society… vs Income Tax Officer, Exemption Ward - 1…ITA 310/RJT/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ganesh Trimbak Saraf And Another vs. The State Of Maharashtra And AnotherBombay · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vajram Infra Material Industries vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Tyre Center vs. The Superintendent Of CGSTAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Monolith Resorts Private Limited vs. The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Sutlej Textiles And Industries Limited vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026