FOSBECCI ASSOCIATION,KOLKATA vs. CIT(E), KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the CIT(Exemption) did not grant a fair opportunity to the assessee to respond to queries and provide documentation. Therefore, the impugned order was set aside and the matter was restored for fresh adjudication.
What were the facts?
The assessee's application under section 12A(1)(ac)(iii) was rejected by the CIT(Exemption) without providing a proper opportunity to submit requested details and documents. The assessee failed to appear on the scheduled date, and the order was passed shortly thereafter.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(Exemption) erred in rejecting the application without affording a reasonable opportunity to the assessee to furnish required information and documents.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘C’ BENCH, KOLKATA
Before: Dr. Manish Borad & Shri Sonjoy Sarma
Per Dr. Manish Borad, Accountant Member:- This appeal at the instance of assessee for assessment year 2023-24 is directed against the order of
Assessment Year: 2023-2024 Fosbecci Association ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Kolkata dated 13.04.2023.
The grievance of the assessee is that the ld. CIT(Exemption) erred in rejecting the application made under section 12A(1)(ac)(iii) of the Act without giving proper opportunity to file various details and documents as called for in the questionnaire and requested to provide one more opportunity to go before ld. CIT (Exemption). The ld. D.R. did not oppose to it.
We have heard the rival contentions. We notice that the ld. CIT(Exemption) rejected the application of the assessee filed for approval under section 12(1)(ac)(iii) of the Act in Form No. 10AB. The ld. CIT(Exemption) asked for certain clarification to the assessee, but assessee failed to appear on the given date, i.e. 10.04.2023 and immediately thereafter on 13.04.2023 the application in question before him was rejected. We notice that the ld. CIT did not give fair opportunity to the assessee for giving reply to the questions and also to produce various details and documents as called for. We, therefore, in the interest of justice and fair to both the parties, set aside the impugned order of ld. CIT(Exemption) and restore the issues to the file of ld. CIT(Exemption) for fresh adjudication on due consideration of submission to be filed by assessee for which reasonable opportunity of being heard should be granted.
Assessment Year: 2023-2024 Fosbecci Association
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open Court on 20th June, 2023.
More judgments on Section 12A(1)(ac)(iii)
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sevasetu Foundation, Vadodara vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption)…ITA 3149/AHD/2026[NA]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026
- Sevasetu Foundation, Vadodara vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption)…ITA 3148/AHD/2026[NA]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026
- Sanskardham Nandan, Mehsana vs CIT(Exemption), AhmedabadITA 2980/AHD/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- D vs Welfare Foundation, Thanevs.Income Tax…ITA 6191/MUM/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026
- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026
- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026