BALLYGUNJ SOCIETY FOR CHILDREN IN PAIN CHIP,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O.(EXEMPTION), WARD - 1(2), KOLKATA, KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the delay in filing Form 10B was condoned by the CIT(Exemption). Therefore, the Assessing Officer was directed to allow admissible deductions under Section 11.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a charitable society, claimed deduction under Section 11. The Assessing Officer disallowed expenditure due to delayed filing of Form 10B, which was confirmed by the CIT(A).
What were the issues?
Whether the disallowance of deduction under Section 11 is justified solely on the ground of delayed filing of Form 10B, when the delay has been condoned.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH KOLKATA
Before: Shri Sanjay Garg & Dr. Manish Borad
order : June 27, 2023 आदेश / ORDER संजय गग�, �या�यक सद�य �वारा / Per Sanjay Garg, Judicial Member: The present appeal has been preferred by the assessee against the order dated 17.11.2022 of the National Faceless Appeal Centre (hereinafter referred to as the ‘CIT(A)’) passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’).
The brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a charitable society registered u/s 12A of the Act. The assessee claimed deduction u/s 11 of the Act in respect of income spent on charitable purposes. However, the Assessing Officer/CPC disallowed the expenditure spent towards charitable purposes for delay in filing of form 10B. The CIT(A) confirmed the additions so made by the Assessing Officer. Assessment year: 2020- Ballygunj Society For Children In Pain Chip 3. Before us, the ld. counsel for the assessee has, at the outset, furnished the copy of the order of the CIT(Exemption) dated 28.11.2022, whereby, the ld. CIT(Exemption) has condoned the delay of 32 days in filing form 10B to the assessee. In view of the above circumstances, the ld. counsel has submitted that since the delay in filing the Form 10B has been condoned by the competent authority, therefore, the Assessing Officer may be directed the allow the admissible deduction to the assessee u/s 11 of the Act as a charitable institution. Considering the above factual position, the Assessing Officer is directed to process the return of income of the assessee and allow the admissible deductions in accordance with law irrespective of any delay of filing of Form 10B, the delay since stood condoned by the ld. CIT(Exemption).
More judgments on Section 11
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Mata Lachmi Rotary Charitable Society… vs Income Tax Officer, Exemption Ward - 1…ITA 310/RJT/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 531/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 530/NAG/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- J.M.Swamy vs. Government Of INDIAKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- S. Nithyananda vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Acc LTD. vs. Secy.Industries Deptt.Orissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Kumaran Transports (Tuticorin) Private Limited vs. The Assistant Commissioner Madras · 16 Oct 2026