SHRI SHAMBHU SHARAN SINGH,GOPALGANJ vs. ACIT CIRCLE- 2 (1), MUZAFFARPUR

PDF · subscribers
ITA 346/PAT/2023Status: DisposedITAT Patna23 December 2024AY 2012-133 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal, while noting the assessee's non-compliance, decided to grant one more opportunity based on principles of natural justice. The case was remanded back to the Assessing Officer for a fresh assessment.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed a return for AY 2012-13. The original assessment was revised under Section 263 due to issues with bank credits and contractual receipts. The assessee failed to appear before the AO and CIT(A), leading to ex-parte orders.

What were the issues?

Whether the ex-parte assessment orders passed due to non-compliance by the assessee should be set aside to allow the assessee an opportunity to present their case.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 143(3),Section 263,Section 142(1),Section 144

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PATNA BENCH, PATNA

For Appellant: Shri Manish Rastogi, AR
For Respondent: Shri Ajay Kr. Shukla, DR
Hearing: 18.12.2024Pronounced: 23.12.2024
2.

The original assessment order u/s 143(3) of the Act was completed on 19.03.2015 at Rs.72,31,410/-. Later, the ld. PCIT invoked section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (the Act) to revise the assessment due to specific issues not properly examined by the ld. Assessing Officer on the issue of Rs.1,61,03,705/- credited in the bank A/c of the assessee and sum of Rs.5,81,189/- was left to be included in the

3.

Dissatisfied with the above order assessee went in appeal before the ld. CIT(A) but failed to appear on 16th consecutive hearing dates, leading to this the ld. CIT(A) has passed an ex-parte order against the assessee.

4.

Aggrieved by the order of the ld. CIT(A), assessee appealed to the Tribunal raising several grounds primarily arguing that the ex-parte order of the ld. Assessing Officer and CIT(A) denied the assessee an opportunity to present its case. Therefore, the ld. AR requested another opportunity to comply and provide support evidence in order to controverted the facts.

5.

On the other hand, the ld. DR opposed the appeal, emphasizing that the assessee has non-compliance history and arguing for dismissal of assessee’s appeal.

7.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced in the open court on 23.12.2024.

More judgments on Section 263

All 13,616 judgments and leading authorities on Section 263 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →