SHRI SHAMBHU SHARAN SINGH,GOPALGANJ vs. ACIT CIRCLE- 2 (1), MUZAFFARPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal, while noting the assessee's non-compliance, decided to grant one more opportunity based on principles of natural justice. The case was remanded back to the Assessing Officer for a fresh assessment.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed a return for AY 2012-13. The original assessment was revised under Section 263 due to issues with bank credits and contractual receipts. The assessee failed to appear before the AO and CIT(A), leading to ex-parte orders.
What were the issues?
Whether the ex-parte assessment orders passed due to non-compliance by the assessee should be set aside to allow the assessee an opportunity to present their case.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PATNA BENCH, PATNA
The original assessment order u/s 143(3) of the Act was completed on 19.03.2015 at Rs.72,31,410/-. Later, the ld. PCIT invoked section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (the Act) to revise the assessment due to specific issues not properly examined by the ld. Assessing Officer on the issue of Rs.1,61,03,705/- credited in the bank A/c of the assessee and sum of Rs.5,81,189/- was left to be included in the
Dissatisfied with the above order assessee went in appeal before the ld. CIT(A) but failed to appear on 16th consecutive hearing dates, leading to this the ld. CIT(A) has passed an ex-parte order against the assessee.
Aggrieved by the order of the ld. CIT(A), assessee appealed to the Tribunal raising several grounds primarily arguing that the ex-parte order of the ld. Assessing Officer and CIT(A) denied the assessee an opportunity to present its case. Therefore, the ld. AR requested another opportunity to comply and provide support evidence in order to controverted the facts.
On the other hand, the ld. DR opposed the appeal, emphasizing that the assessee has non-compliance history and arguing for dismissal of assessee’s appeal.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the open court on 23.12.2024.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Gr Infra Projects Limited Ratlam Through Its Authorized Signatory Mr. Pankaj Das vs. The State Of Madhya PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary Dept. Of Revenue Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shree Sushruta Health Services Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Rst Batteries vs. Deputy Commissioner CGST Delhi West & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026