A.C.T.I.,CIRCLE-11(2), KOLKATA vs. M/S KILBURN CHEMICAL LTD., KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the NCLT's order approving the resolution plan made it binding on all stakeholders, including the Income-tax Department. Consequently, the appeal was rendered infructuous.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against an order of the CIT(A) that deleted provisions related to Section 50B. The assessee company underwent Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, and a resolution plan was approved by the NCLT, extinguishing its liabilities.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal has become infructuous due to the approval of a resolution plan under the IBC, which extinguished the assessee's tax liabilities.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH KOLKATA
Before: SHRI RAJPAL YADAV & SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL
ORDER
PER GIRISH AGRAWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
This appeal filed by the Revenue is against the order of Ld. CIT(A)-4, Kolkata vide Appeal No. 214/CIT(A)-4/15-16 dated 29.03.2019 passed against the assessment order by DCIT (OSD), Corporate Circle-4, Kolkata u/s. 143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”), dated 23.03.2015 for AY 2012-13.
Ground of appeal of revenue is reproduced as under:
“That on the facts and the circumstances of the case, the Ld. CIT(A) erred in deleting the provisions of section 50B by admitting the additional evidence without giving the AO the opportunity to examine and comment.” 3. On the last hearing held on 13.06.2023, it was noted by the Bench that “a letter dated 12.06.2023 has been received
M/s. Kilburn Chemicals Ltd. AY 2012-13 from assessee company stating therein that the assessee company had went through Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process. Subsequently, resolution plan was approved by the Hon'ble NCLT vide order dated 16.12.2021. It has been further stated therein that after the approval of the resolution plan, the liabilities of the assessee company including the income-tax liability has stood extinguished and no proceedings in respect of claims prior to the approval of plan, can be initiated or continued. It has therefore been pleaded in the said letter that since the income-tax liability of the assessee company has stood extinguished, therefore, the present appeal has become infructuous. Ld. DR, however, wants to get instructions from the ld. PCIT in this respect. In view of this, adjourned to 26.07.2023.”
In view of the above, a specific query was raised by the Bench to the Ld. CIT,DR to which he candidly accepted that the appeal has become infructuous as resolution plan has been approved by the Ld. National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) vide order dated 16.12.2021.
Before us, none appeared on behalf of the assessee, however, a written submission is placed on record, giving the details in respect of the corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP) completed under the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code 2016, in the case of the assessee. In the submission, assessee has submitted that as per the provisions of IBC and in terms of the order of Ld. NCLT, once resolution plan is approved, its binding on the corporate debtor i.e. the assessee and its employees, members, creditors, guarantors
M/s. Kilburn Chemicals Ltd. AY 2012-13 and other stakeholders involved in the resolution plan including central government, any state etc. to whom a debt in respect of payment of dues arising under any law for the time being in force, are owed.
5.1. According to the assessee, in the present case, the order by Ld. NCLT refers to all the liabilities and demands of the Income-tax Department, crystallised or not and for all the years prior to the date of order i.e. 16.12.2021. The same is contained in para no. 26(c) of the said order. The same is extracted as under:
5.2. Accordingly, in the case of assessee, all the liabilities prior to the date of order i.e. 16.12.2021 stands extinguished
M/s. Kilburn Chemicals Ltd. AY 2012-13 and thus, the present appeal is rendered infructuous. Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed as infructuous.
In the result, appeal of revenue is dismissed.
More judgments on Section 50B
- DCIT, Circle-22(2), Delhi vs Savista Global Solutions Private Limited…ITA 1729/DEL/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- R.S.Jhaveri & Co., Mumbai vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 2441/PUN/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed18 Aug 2026AY 2014-15
- R.S.Jhaveri & Co., Mumbai vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 2440/PUN/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed18 Aug 2026AY 2016-17
- ITO, Mumbai vs Suresh Amrutrao Chavan, MumbaiITA 5305/MUM/2025[2012]Status: Disposed14 Aug 2026
- Dosch Pharmaceutucals Pvt Ltd, Mumbai vs Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax Circle…ITA 2088/MUM/2026[2014-15]Status: Disposed7 Aug 2026AY 2014-15
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sutlej Textiles And Industries Limited vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S. Ut Corp vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- Sunrise Engineering vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Kalra Traders vs. Union Of INDIAUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Ms Isoft vs. The Commissioner State TaxUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026