WEST BENGAL WELFARE SOCIETY,KOLKATA vs. CIT(EXEMPTION),KOLKATA, KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CIT(E) did not grant proper opportunity to the assessee for the Section 12A application and set aside the order. For the Section 80G application, the Tribunal found that the CIT(E) misinterpreted the proviso and that the assessee's application was not time-barred. Both matters were restored to the CIT(E) for fresh decision.
What were the facts?
The assessee applied for final registration under Section 12A(1)(ac)(iii) and Section 80G of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(E) rejected both applications. The assessee contended that it was not given adequate opportunity for the Section 12A application and that the CIT(E) misinterpreted the proviso for the Section 80G application.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(E) provided adequate opportunity to the assessee for registration and whether the application for Section 80G registration was time-barred.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH KOLKATA
Before: Shri Sanjay Garg & Dr. Manish Borad
order : September 13, 2023 आदेश / ORDER संजय गग�, �या�यक सद�य �वारा / Per Sanjay Garg, Judicial Member: The captioned appeals have been preferred by the assessee against the separate orders both dated 27.06.2023 of Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Kolkata (hereinafter referred to as the ‘CIT(E)’). 12A(1)(ac)(iii) of the Income Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’) as a charitable institution, whereas, vide the assessee has contested the rejection of application for final registration u/s 80G of the Act.
At the outset, the ld. counsel for the assessee has invited our attention to the order dated 27.06.2023 of the ld. CIT(E) passed in I.T.A Nos.730&731/Kol/2023 Assessment year: 2023-24 West Bengal Welfare Society relation to the application of the assessee for grant of final registration u/s 12AA/12A(1)(ac)(iii) of the Act to submit that the same is an ex parte order. The ld. counsel has submitted that as per the order of the ld. CIT(E), notice of hearing was issued to the assessee vide letter dated 16.06.2023 fixing the hearing for 21.06.2023. However, the assessee did not receive any communication regarding hearing from the CIT(E). The ld. counsel has submitted that the assessee has already been granted provisional registration u/s 12A of the Act. That the assessee has not given proper and adequate opportunity by the ld. CIT(E) to present its case.
The ld. DR, on the other hand, has relied upon the impugned order of the ld. CIT(E).
We have heard the rival contentions and gone through the record. We find that only a single opportunity has given by the ld. CIT(E) to the assessee to present its case. The time period of issue of notice/letter and the date of fixing of hearing was very short. The proper opportunity in this case has not been granted by the ld. CIT(E) to the assessee. In view of this, the impugned order of the CIT(E) is set aside and the matter is restored to the file of the CIT(E) for decision afresh on the application of assessee for final registration u/s 12AA/12A(1)(ac)(iii) of the Act.
Now, coming to the assessee’s appeal ITA No.731/Kol/2023 for final registration u/s 80G of the Act. The assessee was granted provisional approval under Clause (iv) of first proviso to section 80G(5) of the Act on 30.11.2022. Thereafter, the assessee applied for final approval Clause (iii) of first proviso to section 80G(5) of the Act on 03.12.2022. The ld. CIT(E) however, referred to the said clause (iii) of proviso to section 80G(5) of the Act, which reads as under:
I.T.A Nos.730&731/Kol/2023 Assessment year: 2023-24 West Bengal Welfare Society (iii) Where the institution or fund has been provisionally approved, at least six months prior to expiry of the period of the provisional approval or within six months of commencement of its activities whichever is earlier.” The ld. CIT(E) concluded from the above proviso that the assessee has already commenced its activities in the financial year 2020-21 and that as per Clause (iii) of 1st Proviso to section 80G(5) of the Act, the application for final registration was to be filed within six months from the commencement of its activities. He, therefore, held that the application of the assessee for final registration was time-barred.
We note that the ld. CIT(E) has misconstrued the aforesaid proviso to section 80G(5) of the Act. As per the provision, an application for final registration cannot be filed until and unless an assessee/trust has been given provisional approval u/s 80G(5)(iv) of the Act. The assessee was granted provisional approval on 30.11.2022 only, and within a few days i.e. on 03.12.2022, the assessee applied for final registration u/s Clause (iii) of 1st Proviso to section 80G(5) of the Act. Though the assessee might have commenced its activities prior to grant of provisional registration but that does not mean that the assessee in that event will be precluded from applying for final registration even after the grant of provisional registration. The assessee as per statutory provision could not have directly applied for final registration without grant of provisional registration. The aforesaid proviso, therefore, is to be read as that after the grant of provisional registration, if the assessee has not commenced its activities, he may apply for registration within six months of the commencement of its activities or within the six months prior to the expiry of the period of provisional approval, whichever is earlier. In any case, the assessee is eligible to apply for final registration only after the grant of provisional approval. Therefore, we hold that there is no delay Assessment year: 2023-24 West Bengal Welfare Society
More judgments on Section 12A(1)(ac)(iii)
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sevasetu Foundation, Vadodara vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption)…ITA 3149/AHD/2026[NA]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026
- Sevasetu Foundation, Vadodara vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption)…ITA 3148/AHD/2026[NA]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026
- Sanskardham Nandan, Mehsana vs CIT(Exemption), AhmedabadITA 2980/AHD/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- D vs Welfare Foundation, Thanevs.Income Tax…ITA 6191/MUM/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Mehra Mac Industries Private Limited vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- Santosh Das And Anr. vs. Union Of INDIACalcutta · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026
- Smt Usha W/O Shri Tarun vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maruti Nandan Minetech Private Limited vs. The Joint CommissionerRajasthan · 29 Oct 2026