M/S. SETH B.N. AGARWAL & CO.,BETUL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, BETUL
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that by opting for the Vivad Se Viswas Scheme, the assessee waived its rights under the appellate procedure, making the appeal not maintainable. Consequently, the withdrawal of the appeal was permitted.
What were the facts?
The assessee intended to withdraw its appeal before the ITAT because it had opted for the Vivad Se Viswas Scheme, 2019. The necessary forms were filed and the tax was deposited.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal before the ITAT is maintainable when the assessee has opted for and been accepted under the Vivad Se Viswas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JABALPUR BENCH,
Before: SH. SANJAY ARORA, HONBLE
Per Sanjay Arora, AM This is an Appeal by the Assessee directed against the Order by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-3, Bhopal (‘CIT(A)’ for short) dated 30/10/2018, partly allowing the assessee’s appeal contesting its’ assessment under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('the Act' hereinafter) for the Assessment Year (AY) 2013-14 vide Order dated 02/11/2015. 2. At the very outset, it was submitted by Sh. Purohit, the ld. counsel for the assessee, that the assessee intends to withdraw its’ appeal in view of it having opted for the ‘Vivad Se Viswas Scheme, 2019’. The same has since been accepted and Form 3, signifying the same, issued, with the assesee having deposited the requisite tax there
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Md. Akhtar Ansari, Proprietor Of M/S Indian Associates vs. State Of Jharkhand, Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Commercial Tax Dept.Jharkhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Amarjothi Granites (INDIA) PVT. LTD., Berhampur, Ganjam vs. The Commissioner, Commercial Tax And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mishka Steels LLP And Anr. vs. The Superintendent Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Cx, Range-Ii, Behala Div. And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Gujarat Co-Operative Milk Marketing Federation Limited vs. Union Of INDIAGujarat · 14 Oct 2026
- Ramesh K Devadiga vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co Operative Housing Society LTDBombay · 14 Oct 2026