SH. RAKESH KUMAR CHOPRA,NAWANSHAHR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, NAWANSHAHR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had availed the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and the Income Tax Department had issued Form 3. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the CIT(A)'s order. During the hearing, the assessee did not appear but submitted a withdrawal application. The assessee had opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and received Form 3.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal can be withdrawn by the assessee who has opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
आदेश आदेश/Order आदेश आदेश
PER N.K. SAINI, VICE PRESIDENT:
This is an appeal by the Assessee against the order dt. 28/12/2018 of CIT(A)-I, Jalandhar.
During the course of hearing none appeared on behalf of the assessee but a withdrawal application has been moved by the assessee which reads as under:
Re: Request for withdrawing the appeal Respectfully submitted: The appeal under reference is pending for adjudication before the Hon'ble Bench. However, the appellant has preferred to go for Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and has duly received form No. 3 from the principal CIT-1, Jalandhar. Copy Enclosed It is prayed that keeping in view the scheme of he Act, I may be allowed to withdraw my appeal. Thanking You, Yours faithfully, Sd/- (Rakesh Kumar Chopra) Assessee
In the present case, it is noticed that the assessee has availed the immunity scheme i.e; Vivad Se Vishwas and the Income Tax Department has since issued Form 3 bearing certificate no.122139000070121, in response to the application filed by the assessee, under section 5(1) of the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020, therefore the appeal of the assessee is to be dismissed as withdrawn.
The Ld. DR did not object if appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
In view of the above the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Order pronounced in the open Court on 16/02/2021).
More judgments on Section 5(1)
- Bajrang Singh Rajawat, Jaipur vs ITO Ward-7(2), JaipurITA 1120/JPR/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed30 Jul 2026AY 2014-15
- Krrishraj Construction Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Central Circle-3, SuratITA 1232/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed4 May 2026AY 2016-17
- Krrishraj Construction Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Central Circle-3, SuratITA 1231/SRT/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed4 May 2026AY 2015-16
- Amit Satpathy, Mumbai vs ITO-42(2)(1), MumbaiITA 5930/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed27 Feb 2026AY 2017-18
- Amish Anantrai Modi, Mumbai vs Central Circel 2(1), MumbaiITA 6281/MUM/2025[2011-2012]Status: Disposed9 Dec 2025AY 2011-2012
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- N.K Fashion Through It Proprietor Mr. Narender Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Delhi EastDelhi · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetanj Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Namita Behera vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Ratul Boro vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026