SHRI VIJIA KUMAR ARORA,JALANDHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3 (2), JALANDHAR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had availed the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme and received a certificate. Therefore, the appeal filed by the assessee was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the ITAT after their appeal was dismissed by the CIT(A). The assessee subsequently opted for the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme, 2020, and obtained a certificate under the scheme. The assessee's counsel filed an application to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal can be withdrawn by the assessee after opting for the Vivad se Vishwas Scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Assessee by : None (Withdrawal Application) Revenue by : Smt. Priyanka Singla, JCIT DR Date of Hearing : 17/03/2021 Date of Pronouncement : 17/03/2021 Order PER R.L. NEGI, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
This is an appeal filed by the Assessee against the order of the Ld. CIT(A)-2, Jalandhar dt. 05/07/2018.
During the course of hearing nobody was present on behalf of the assessee. However the Ld. Counsel of the Assessee has furnished an application for withdrawal of this appeal stating therein as under:
SUB: WITHDRAWN OF APPEAL IN THE CASE OF SH. VIJIA KUMAR ARORA, 430-L, MODEL TOWN, JALANDHAR FOR THE ASSTT. YEAR 2010-11.
Sir, In connection with above it is submitted that assessment in the case of assessee was completed u/s 143(3) r.w.s 147 of the I.T. Act, 1961. Assessee preferred an appeal before the Worthy CIT(A)-2, Jalandhar, wherein the appeal was dismissed, thereafter assessee further preferred appeal before your good self vide dated 28.08.2018.
Sir, it is submitted that assessee have opted for Scheme under Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020, copy of Form-3 is enclosed herewith. It is therefore requested that appeal filed may kindly be treated as withdrawn.
Thanking you,
Your’s faithfully Sd/- (Dinesh Sarna) Counsel for the Assessee
In the present case, it is noticed that the assessee has availed the immunity scheme i.e; Vivad Se Vishwas and the Income Tax Department has since issued Form 3 bearing certificate no. 871132550231220, in response to the application filed by the assessee, under section 5(1) of the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020, therefore the appeal of the assessee is to be dismissed as withdrawn.
The Ld. DR did not object if appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
In view of the above the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced on 17/03/2021.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Maa Swarnapai Chemicals (Opc) Private Limited, Cuttack vs. Sales Tax Officer, Cuttack IOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Middlex, Puri vs. Commnr. Of State Tax, Banijyakar Bhawan, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Sunadei Indane Gramin Vitrak, Nayagarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Cuttack, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Sunanda Raul vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods Nad Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Zakir Hussain Ali Khan vs. Additional Commissioner (Appeals), BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026