INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, REWA vs. SHRI NARAYAN MISHRA, REWA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the Revenue's appeal was not maintainable as the exception for accepted audit objections was not met. The Assessing Officer had explicitly disagreed with the audit objection, stating the assessee's explanation was accepted and it was a case of change of opinion.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against an order that partly allowed the assessee's appeal against an assessment under Section 147. The appeal was filed under an exception to monetary limits for appeals, citing an accepted Revenue Audit objection.
What were the issues?
Whether the Revenue's appeal, filed below the monetary limit, was maintainable under the exception for accepted audit objections. Whether the Assessing Officer had accepted the Revenue Audit objection.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JABALPUR BENCH,
Before: SH. SANJAY ARORA, HONBLE
Per Sanjay Arora, AM This is an Appeal by the Revenue directed against the Order by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Jabalpur (‘CIT(A)’ for short) dated 11/9/2020, partly allowing the Assessee’s appeal contesting his assessment under section 147 read with sec.144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’ hereinafter) for the Assessment Year 2013-14 vide order dated 13/11/2019. 2. At the outset, confirmation was sought by the Bench from Sh. Srivastava, the ld. Counsel for the assessee, as to if the assessee had filed any Appeal or Cross Objection in respect of the impugned order, to which he replied in the negative, further clarifying that the same is being contested on merits, i.e.,
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S South INDIA Trading Company vs. Additional Commissioner Adjudication CGST Delhi North & Anr.Delhi · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Rishi Stonex vs. The State Of Assam And 5 OthersGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- Gopal Datt vs. Vishal Kumar SharmaUttarakhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Do Nam Enterprise And Anr vs. The Union Of INDIA And 2 OrsGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- M Sundaravel vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Central GST And Central ExciseMadras · 13 Oct 2026