UNIQUE SHELL MOULD (INDIA) P LTD,COIMBATORE vs. CIT(A),NFAC, DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal confirmed the disallowance of belated PF/ESI contributions, citing the Supreme Court's decision. For the Section 80IA deduction, the tribunal remanded the issue to the CIT(A) to await the CBDT's decision on the condonation of delay.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal concerns the disallowance of payments for belated remittance of employee contributions to PF and ESI, and the disallowance of deduction under Section 80IA due to delayed filing of the return.
What were the issues?
Whether belated remittances of employee PF/ESI contributions are disallowable, and whether Section 80IA deduction is allowable when the return is filed beyond the due date.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘C’ BENCH, CHENNAI
Before: SHRI MAHAVIR SINGHAND SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL
O R D E R
PER MAHAVIR SINGH, VICE PRESIDENT:
This appeal by the assessee is arising out of the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi in Appeal No. CIT(A), Coimbatore-1/10010/2020-21 dated 30.10.2021. The return of income was processed by the CPC, Bangalore by issuing intimation u/s.143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter the ‘Act’) for the relevant assessment year 2019- 20 vide order dated 16.05.2020.
The first issue in this appeal of assessee is as regards to the order of CIT(A) confirming the disallowance of payments towards belated remittance of employees contribution to PF and ESI amounting to Rs.8,30,703/-.
At the outset, the ld.AR for the assessee fairly agreed that the employees contribution to PF & ESI were remitted beyond the due date of respective statutes of PF & ESI Act. Hence, this issue is squarely covered by the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Checkmate Services P. Ltd., in Civil Appeal No.2833 of 2016, order dated 12.10.2022 in favour of Revenue. Since the issue is covered by the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court, as admitted by assessee, we confirm the order of CIT(A) on this issue.
3. The next issue in this appeal of assessee is as regards to the order of CIT(A) confirming the disallowance of claim of deduction u/s.80IA of the Act amounting to Rs.1,03,31,002/- on the ground that the return of income was not filed within the due date as prescribed under the Act.
More judgments on Section 80IA
- DCIT, Circle-4(1)(1), Ahmedabad, Vejalpur vs Vijay M. Mistry Construction Private…ITA 964/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- DCIT, Circle-4(1)(1), Ahmedabad, Vejalpur… vs Vijay M. Mistry Construction Private…ITA 963/AHD/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- DCIT, Circle-4(1)(1), Ahmedabad, Vejalpur vs Vijay M. Mistry Construction Private…ITA 964/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- DCIT, Circle-4(1)(1), Ahmedabad, Vejalpur… vs Vijay M. Mistry Construction Private…ITA 963/AHD/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed6 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Klsr Infratech Limited, Hyderabad vs DCIT, Central Circle-1(2), HyderabadITA 2323/HYD/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Vinay Singh vs. Union Of INDIAAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Aaradhyam Infrabuilders PVT LTD vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Shivam Tiles House vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Its Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr The Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026