PASIKUDIL TRUST,CUDDALORE vs. ITO, WARD-1, CUDDALORE

PDF · subscribers
ITA 961/CHNY/2022Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 February 2023AY 2021-212 pages
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that if exemption is denied due to belated filing, only the surplus income, not the entire gross receipts, should be brought to tax. The AO was directed to re-determine the income accordingly.

What were the facts?

The assessee trust filed its return of income belatedly, leading to denial of exemption under sections 11/12 by the CPC. The CIT(A) upheld this denial based on Section 13(9).

What were the issues?

Whether the entire gross receipts or only the surplus income should be taxed when exemption under sections 11/12 is denied due to belated filing of the return.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 11,Section 12,Section 13(9),Section 143(1)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘C/SMC’ BENCH, CHENNAI

Before: SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM

आदेश / O R D E R

1.

Aforesaid appeal by assessee for Assessment Year (AY) 2020-21 arises out of the order of learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [CIT(A)] dated 19-09-2022 in the matter of an intimation dated 30-11-2021 issued by Centralized Processing Center, Bangalore (CPC) u/s. 143(1) of the Act determining income of Rs.10.63 Lacs. In the said intimation, the assessee has been denied exemption u/s 11 / 12 as claimed by the assessee due to the fact that the return of income was filed belatedly on 31.03.2021.

2.

The Ld. CIT(A), considering the provisions of Sec.13(9) as inserted by Finance Act, 2015 w.e.f. 01-04-2016, upheld the denial of 2 - deduction. Aggrieved, the assessee is in further appeal before me wherein limited submissions of Ld. AR that only net income should be brought to tax and not the gross receipts as done by CPC.

3.

After due consideration of case records, I find that the assessee has admitted gross receipts of Rs.10.63 Lacs and incurred administrative expenditure and certain amount has been expanded for charitable purposes. Prima facie, the assessee has earned surplus of Rs.0.18 Lacs which precisely is the argument before me. I am of the considered opinion, in case the deduction is to be denied, only the surplus and not the entire gross receipts should be brought to tax. The Ld. AO is directed to verify the same and re-determine the income of the assessee accordingly.

4.

The appeal stands partly allowed in terms of above order. Order pronounced on 20th February, 2023.

More judgments on Section 11

All 7,190 judgments and leading authorities on Section 11 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →