PASIKUDIL TRUST,CUDDALORE vs. ITO, WARD-1, CUDDALORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that if exemption is denied due to belated filing, only the surplus income, not the entire gross receipts, should be brought to tax. The AO was directed to re-determine the income accordingly.
What were the facts?
The assessee trust filed its return of income belatedly, leading to denial of exemption under sections 11/12 by the CPC. The CIT(A) upheld this denial based on Section 13(9).
What were the issues?
Whether the entire gross receipts or only the surplus income should be taxed when exemption under sections 11/12 is denied due to belated filing of the return.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘C/SMC’ BENCH, CHENNAI
Before: SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM
आदेश / O R D E R
Aforesaid appeal by assessee for Assessment Year (AY) 2020-21 arises out of the order of learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [CIT(A)] dated 19-09-2022 in the matter of an intimation dated 30-11-2021 issued by Centralized Processing Center, Bangalore (CPC) u/s. 143(1) of the Act determining income of Rs.10.63 Lacs. In the said intimation, the assessee has been denied exemption u/s 11 / 12 as claimed by the assessee due to the fact that the return of income was filed belatedly on 31.03.2021.
The Ld. CIT(A), considering the provisions of Sec.13(9) as inserted by Finance Act, 2015 w.e.f. 01-04-2016, upheld the denial of 2 - deduction. Aggrieved, the assessee is in further appeal before me wherein limited submissions of Ld. AR that only net income should be brought to tax and not the gross receipts as done by CPC.
After due consideration of case records, I find that the assessee has admitted gross receipts of Rs.10.63 Lacs and incurred administrative expenditure and certain amount has been expanded for charitable purposes. Prima facie, the assessee has earned surplus of Rs.0.18 Lacs which precisely is the argument before me. I am of the considered opinion, in case the deduction is to be denied, only the surplus and not the entire gross receipts should be brought to tax. The Ld. AO is directed to verify the same and re-determine the income of the assessee accordingly.
The appeal stands partly allowed in terms of above order. Order pronounced on 20th February, 2023.
More judgments on Section 11
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Mata Lachmi Rotary Charitable Society… vs Income Tax Officer, Exemption Ward - 1…ITA 310/RJT/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 531/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Sweekar, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 1, Exemp, NagpurITA 530/NAG/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Modern Engineers And Contractors vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- K Madhusudan Reddy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Sandeep Ranjan Rout vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Gagan Bihari Rout@Gagan Rout vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Biswanath Rana vs. The Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 28 Oct 2026