← Back to search

BHARAT KUMAR VARMA,NOIDA vs. ITO WARD-5(1)(2), NOIDA

PDF
ITA 3268/DEL/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 July 20253 pages

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘SMC’, NEW DELHI

Before: Sh. Satbeer Singh Godara

For Appellant: Sh. Abhishek Jain, CA
For Respondent: Sh. Manoj Kumar, Sr. DR
Hearing: 23.07.2025Pronounced: 23.07.2025

This assessee’s appeal for Assessment Year 2017-18, arises against the Addl./JCIT(A)-1, Mumbai’s DIN & order No.
ITBA/APL/S/250/2024-25/1074689020(1) dated 19.03.2025, in proceedings u/s 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “the Act”).

2.

Heard both the parties at length. Case file perused.

3.

Learned counsel submits that on account of communication gaps at various levels, the assessee could not appear to plead and prove all the relevant facts in the lower appellate proceedings and therefore, in the larger interest of justice met in case, the matter be restored back to the CIT(A)/NFAC. Bharat Kumar Varma

2
4. Be that as it may, the fact remains that possibility of some communication gaps at various levels in such an instance of the newly introduced virtual hearing mechanism could not be altogether ruled out. This is indeed coupled with the facts that there is also no effective compliance to section 250(6) of the Act in the impugned lower appellate order stipulating points of determination to be framed followed by a detailed adjudication thereupon. It is therefore deemed appropriate in the larger interest of justice to set aside the assessee’s instant appeal back to the CIT(A)/NFAC for his afresh appropriate adjudication, within three effective opportunities of hearing at the appellant’s risk and responsibility, in consequential proceedings. Ordered accordingly.

5.

So far as assessee’s assessment under Section 115BBE is concerned, we quote S.M.I.L.E Microfinance Limited Vs. The ACIT CC-1 in W.P.(MD) No.2078 of 2020 & W.M.P. (MD) No. 1742 of 2020 held that the said provision applied for transactions done on or after 01.04.2017 only. The assessee is accordingly directed to be assessed under normal provisions only. Bharat Kumar Varma

3
6. This assessee’s appeal is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order Pronounced in the Open Court on 23/07/2025. (Satbeer Singh Godara)

Judicial Member

Dated: 23/07/2025
*Subodh Kumar, Sr. PS*

BHARAT KUMAR VARMA,NOIDA vs ITO WARD-5(1)(2), NOIDA | BharatTax