M/S AGRI HILLS FARM ESTATES INDAI PVT. LTD.,HOSUR, KRISHNAGIRI DISTRICT vs. ACIT,CIRCLE-1 HOSUR, HOSUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The ITAT set aside the impugned order and restored the appeal to the CIT(A) for de-novo adjudication, considering the principle of natural justice. The CIT(A) was directed to re-consider the condonation application for the delay.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal before the CIT(A) was filed with a delay, which was not condoned. The CIT(A) dismissed the appeal on merits as the assessee did not attend the appellate proceedings. The assessee is now appealing to the ITAT seeking another opportunity to be heard.
What were the issues?
Whether the delay in filing the appeal before the CIT(A) should be condoned and if the assessee should be granted another opportunity of hearing.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ BENCH, CHENNAI
Before: HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AMAND HON’BLE SHRI MANOMOHAN DAS
आदेश / O R D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal (Accountant Member) 1. Aforesaid appeal by assessee for Assessment Year (AY) 2012-13 arises out of the order of learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [CIT(A)] dated 25-01-2023 in the matter of an assessment framed by Ld. Assessing Officer [AO] u/s.143(3) r.w.s. 263 of the Act on 31-12-2016. Upon perusal of assessment order, it could be seen that the assessee has been saddled with sole addition on account of unexplained / bogus creditors.
- 2 - 2. The Ld. AR, drawing attention to the impugned order, submitted that Ld. CIT(A) has erred in not condoning the delay in filing of appeal whereas the delay was sufficiently explained by affidavit of Managing Director of assessee company. A copy of the affidavit has been placed on record. The Ld. AR pleaded for another opportunity of hearing to the assessee. The same has been opposed by Ld. CIT-DR on the ground that the assessee has remained negligent in attending the appellate proceedings.
We find that the assessee’s appeal before first appellate authority was filed with a delay. The assessee could not explain the same and accordingly, the Ld. CIT(A) found no force in submission for late filing of appeal. At the same time, Ld. CIT(A) proceeded to dispose-off the appeal on merits. Since the assessee did not attend appellate proceedings despite being provided with couple of hearing, Ld. CIT(A) dismissed the appeal on merits also. Aggrieved, the assessee is in further appeal before us primarily with a prayer to provide another opportunity of hearing.
Though the assessee has remained negligent in attending the appellate proceedings, however, keeping in mind the principle of natural justice, we deem it fit to provide another opportunity of hearing to the assessee. Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and the appeal is restored to first appellate authority for de-novo adjudication. The ld. CIT(A) may re-consider condonation application filed by the assessee. If the delay is condoned, the appeal may be adjudicated on merits. The assessee, in turn, is directed to substantiate its stand. Needless to add that reasonable opportunity of hearing shall be granted to the assessee.
- 3 - 5. The appeal stand allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open Court on 25th April, 2023.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sri Alok Kumar Singh vs. The State Of Assam And 3 OrsGauhati · 5 Nov 2026
- Sri Mintu Das vs. The Union Of INDIA And 3 OrsGauhati · 5 Nov 2026
- Alhanney Guest House vs. The State Of Assam And 3 OrsGauhati · 5 Nov 2026
- Abdul Majid vs. The Union Of INDIA And 3 OrsGauhati · 5 Nov 2026
- Dipankar Borgohain vs. The Union Of INDIA And 7 OrsGauhati · 5 Nov 2026