No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH, CHENNAI
Before: HON’BLE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VP & HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM
आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण “बी” �ायपीठ चे�ई म�। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” BENCH, CHENNAI माननीय �ी महावीर िसंह, उपा ! एवं माननीय �ी मनोज कुमार अ&वाल ,लेखा सद) के सम!। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VP AND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM आयकरअपील सं./ (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2018-19) ACIT M/s. Tidel Park Limited बनाम Corporate Circle-3(1), 4, Rajiv Gandhi Salai, / Vs. Chennai. Taramani, Chennai-600 113. �थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No. AABCT-0666-R (अपीलाथ�/Appellant) : (� थ� / Respondent) अपीलाथ�कीओरसे/ Appellant by : Shri D.Hema Bhupal (JCIT)- Ld. DR � थ�कीओरसे/Respondent by : Shri R.Vijayaraghavan(Advocate)- Ld.AR सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date of Hearing : 03-07-2023 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date of Pronouncement : 03-07-2023 आदेश / O R D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal (Accountant Member) 1. The sole grievance of the Revenue in the captioned appeal is deletion of disallowance u/s.14A. Upon perusal of para 7.1 of the impugned order, it could be seen that the Ld. AO has computed disallowance u/s.14A for Rs.153.25 Lacs. However, the assessee has not earned any exempt income during the year. The Ld. CIT(A), relying on the decision of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of PCIT Vs. M/s. Era Infrastructure (India) Ltd., has deleted impugned disallowance. Aggrieved, the revenue is in further appeal before us.
We find that this issue is squarely covered in assessee’s favour by the decision of the Hon’ble Madras High Court in the case of CIT Vs. Chettinad Logistics Pvt. Ltd. in TCA No. 24 of 2017 dated 13-03- 2017 wherein similar ratio has been laid down. Therefore, no interference is called for in the impugned order.
The appeal stand dismissed. Order pronounced on 03rd July, 2023