M/S RTR DHARUMAIYAN MALLIKA EDUCATIOANL TRUST.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT CPC, DELHI

PDF
ITA 389/CHNY/2023Status: DisposedITAT Chennai31 July 2023AY 2018-20196 pages

No AI summary yet for this case.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ (SMC

Before: SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH

For Respondent: Shri D. Hema Bhupal, JCIT
Hearing: 03.07.2023Pronounced: 31.07.2023

आदेश आदेश /O R D E R आदेश आदेश

This appeal filed by the assessee is arising out of the order of

the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless

Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi in order No.ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022-

23/1049390060(1) dated 03.02.2023. The assessment was framed

by the Income Tax Officer, National E-Assessment Centre, Delhi for

the assessment year 2018-19 u/s.143(3) r.w.s. 143(3A) & 143(3B)

of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter ‘the Act’) vide order dated

25.02.2021.

- 2 - ITA No.389/Chny/2023

2.

The only issue in this appeal of assessee is as regards to the

order of CIT(A) in disallowing the expenses net out of cash

amounting to Rs. 3,60,140/- and added the same to the returned

income of the assessee. For this, the assessee has raised various

grounds, which need not be reproduced.

3.

I have heard the rival contentions and gone through the facts and

circumstances of the case. I noted that the A.O disallowed the expenses

in the absence of vouchers, despite the fact that the third party

confirmation was filed by the assessee in regard to additional expenses

under the head “vehicle maintenance charges at Rs.1,50,000/-” and

thereby, out of the total expenses of Rs. 4,93,460/-, the A.O allowed only

Rs. 1,33,500/- being proof of payment and disallowed the balance. The

assessee before A.O as well as before CIT(A) contended that all these

vehicle maintenance charges are incurred in relate to minor and paid

expenses on day to day basis. The assessee is running an educational

institution and is a non-profit oriented entity. Its main objective is to

promote education to children the economically poor and down trodden

section of the society in a very remote and interior part of a village

Thethakudi, which is situated near Vedaranyam, a coastal area of

Nagapattinam District. The village has a total population of 7695 people.

For the year under scrutiny, the assessee, disclosed gross receipts of

- 3 - ITA No.389/Chny/2023 Rs. 49,25,049/- and claimed an expenditure of Rs. 53,65,092/- in the

return of income. I noted that once the assessee’s case is clear cut, the

claim of expenditure of Rs. 53,65,092/- out of which paid expenses of Rs.

3,60,140/- could not be vouched, because paid expenses of minor

maintenance of vehicles. I find the explaining as reasonable and hence,

allow the expenses.

4.

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Order pronounced on 31st July, 2023 at Chennai.

Sd/- (महावीर �सह ) (MAHAVIR SINGH) उपा�य� /VICE PRESIDENT चे�ई/Chennai, �दनांक/Dated, the 31st July, 2023 EDN आदेश क� �ितिलिप अ!ेिषत/Copy to: 1. अपीलाथ�/Appellant 2. ��यथ�/Respondent 3. आयकर आयु# /CIT 4. िवभागीय �ितिनिध/DR 5. गाड' फाईल/GF.

आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, ‘बी’ (एस एम सी) �यायपीठ,चे�ई IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘B’ (SMC) BENCH, CHENNAI �ी महावीर �सह, उपा�य� के सम� BEFORE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VICE PRESIDENT आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.: 389/CHNY/2023 िनधा�रण वष�/Assessment Year: 2018-19

M/s. RTR Dharumaiyan The Addl./Joint/Deputy/ Mallika Educational Trust, Vs. Asst. Commissioner of C-125, Kurunji Nagar, Income Tax / Income Tax Ramapuram, Officer, Chennai -600 089. National E-Assessment Centre, Delhi. PAN:AABTR 9434J (अपीलाथ�/Appellant) (��यथ�/Respondent)

अपीलाथ� क� ओर से/Appellant by : Shri K.R. Sudersan, CA ��यथ� क� ओर से/Respondent by : Shri D. Hema Bhupal, JCIT

सुनवाई क� तारीख/Date of Hearing : 03.07.2023 घोषणा क� तारीख/Date of Pronouncement : 31.07.2023

आदेश आदेश /O R D E R आदेश आदेश

This appeal filed by the assessee is arising out of the order of

the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless

Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi in order No.ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022-

23/1049390060(1) dated 03.02.2023. The assessment was framed

by the Income Tax Officer, National E-Assessment Centre, Delhi for

the assessment year 2018-19 u/s.143(3) r.w.s. 143(3A) & 143(3B)

of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter ‘the Act’) vide order dated

25.02.2021.

- 2 - ITA No.389/Chny/2023

2.

The only issue in this appeal of assessee is as regards to the

order of CIT(A) in disallowing the expenses net out of cash

amounting to Rs. 3,60,140/- and added the same to the returned

income of the assessee. For this, the assessee has raised various

grounds, which need not be reproduced.

3.

I have heard the rival contentions and gone through the facts and

circumstances of the case. I noted that the A.O disallowed the expenses

in the absence of vouchers, despite the fact that the third party

confirmation was filed by the assessee in regard to additional expenses

under the head “vehicle maintenance charges at Rs.1,50,000/-” and

thereby, out of the total expenses of Rs. 4,93,460/-, the A.O allowed only

Rs. 1,33,500/- being proof of payment and disallowed the balance. The

assessee before A.O as well as before CIT(A) contended that all these

vehicle maintenance charges are incurred in relate to minor and paid

expenses on day to day basis. The assessee is running an educational

institution and is a non-profit oriented entity. Its main objective is to

promote education to children the economically poor and down trodden

section of the society in a very remote and interior part of a village

Thethakudi, which is situated near Vedaranyam, a coastal area of

Nagapattinam District. The village has a total population of 7695 people.

For the year under scrutiny, the assessee, disclosed gross receipts of

- 3 - ITA No.389/Chny/2023 Rs. 49,25,049/- and claimed an expenditure of Rs. 53,65,092/- in the

return of income. I noted that once the assessee’s case is clear cut, the

claim of expenditure of Rs. 53,65,092/- out of which paid expenses of Rs.

3,60,140/- could not be vouched, because paid expenses of minor

maintenance of vehicles. I find the explaining as reasonable and hence,

allow the expenses.

4.

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Order pronounced on 31st July, 2023 at Chennai.

Sd/- (महावीर �सह ) (MAHAVIR SINGH) उपा�य� /VICE PRESIDENT चे�ई/Chennai, �दनांक/Dated, the 31st July, 2023 EDN आदेश क� �ितिलिप अ!ेिषत/Copy to: 1. अपीलाथ�/Appellant 2. ��यथ�/Respondent 3. आयकर आयु# /CIT 4. िवभागीय �ितिनिध/DR 5. गाड' फाईल/GF.

M/S RTR DHARUMAIYAN MALLIKA EDUCATIOANL TRUST.,CHENNAI vs DCIT CPC, DELHI | BharatTax