PATRONAGE WELFARE AND EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,DELHI vs. DDIT (E), INV.CIRCLE-II, NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal, considering the interest of justice, granted the assessee one more opportunity to present their case. The matters were sent back to the Ld.CIT(A) for a fresh decision after the assessee participates and presents evidence.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeals were filed against the orders of the Ld.CIT(A) who dismissed the appeals ex-parte. The assessee did not avail multiple opportunities to file submissions before the Ld.CIT(A). The Revenue's adjournment application was rejected by the tribunal.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee should be granted another opportunity to present their case before the Ld.CIT(A) after ex-parte dismissal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI “B” BENCH: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI YOGESH KUMAR U.S & SHRI MANISH AGARWAL
The captioned appeals are filed by the assessee against the separate order dated 22.08.2023 & 22.06.2023 passed by Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (A), National Faceless Appeal Centre (“NFAC”), Delhi [“Ld.CIT(A)”] in Appeal No.CIT(A), Delhi- 40/10010/2013-14 and in Appeal No.CIT(A), Delhi- 40/10008/2013-14 passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [“the Act”] arising from the assessment order, both dated 28.03.2013 passed u/s 143(3)/147 of the Act pertaining to assessment years 2007-08 & 2008-09 respectively.
At the time of hearing, no one attended the proceedings on behalf of the assessee.
At the outset, from the perusal of the appellate order, It is seen that Ld.CIT(A) has provided many opportunities to the assessee to file the submissions in support of the grounds of appeals taken before him, however, those opportunities were not availed by the assessee and therefore, Ld.CIT(A) has dismissed the appeals ex- parte to the assessee and confirmed the disallowance made by the AO. Before us, Revenue has filed adjournment application which is rejected and from the perusal of the appellate proceedings, it is seen that the appeal is decided by Ld.CIT(A) ex-parte.
Looking to the facts of the case and in the interest of justice, in our considered opinion, the assessee be granted one more opportunity in the captioned appeals. Therefore, the matters are sent back to the file of Ld.CIT(A) to decide the appeals of the assessee afresh after providing one more opportunity to the assessee. The assessee is also directed to appear before the Ld.CIT(A) and participated in the appellate proceedings and file all the evidences in support of the Grounds of appeals.
In the result, captioned appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the open Court on 24.07.2025.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Akshaya Consortium vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Dipanshu Aggarwal vs. Director General Of GST IntelligenceDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Dezinetree Projects PVT. LTD. vs. Spokes Digital Inc And AnrDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Jaydeep Jayantilal Hudaka vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 28 Oct 2026
- Commissioner/Additional Commissioner Of Central Tax vs. M/S INDIA Agro Exports Private LimitedKarnataka · 28 Oct 2026