K1594 PERUMANALLUR PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY,TIRUPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD(1) 4, TIRUPUR
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the delay in filing the tax audit report was due to the late receipt of the statutory audit report, which was mandatory. Therefore, the delay could not be attributed to the assessee, and no mala fide intention was present.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a Primary Agricultural Cooperative Society, failed to file its tax audit report by the due date of October 31, 2017. The statutory audit report was received in February 2018, after which the tax audit report and return of income were filed. The Assessing Officer levied a penalty under Section 271B for this delay.
What were the issues?
Whether penalty under Section 271B is leviable for delay in filing tax audit report when the delay is caused by late receipt of statutory audit report and there is no mala fide intention.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH, CHENNAI
Before: HON’BLE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VP & HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM
आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण “बी” �ायपीठ चे�ई म�। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” BENCH, CHENNAI माननीय �ी महावीर िसंह, उपा ! एवं माननीय �ी मनोज कुमार अ&वाल ,लेखा सद) के सम!। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VP AND HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM आयकरअपील सं./ (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2017-18) K1594 Perumanallur Primary Agricultural ITO बनाम/ Co-operative Credit Society Ward-1(4), 1, Eswaran Kovil Street, Perumanallur Post, Tirupur. Vs. Avinashi Taluk, Tirupur-641 666. �थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No. AABAK-3989-Q (अपीलाथ�/Appellant) : (� थ� / Respondent) अपीलाथ�कीओरसे/ Appellant by : Ms. A.Vijayalakshmi (CA)-Ld.AR � थ�कीओरसे/Respondent by : Shri D.Hema Bhupal (JCIT)-Ld. Sr. DR सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date of Hearing : 28-11-2023 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date of Pronouncement : 28-11-2023 आदेश / O R D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal (Accountant Member)
Aggrieved by confirmation of penalty u/s 271B for Rs.1.50 Lacs for Assessment Year (AY) 2017-18, the assessee is in further appeal before us. The impugned order has been passed by learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [CIT(A)] on 25.08.2023 in the matter of impugned penalty levied by Ld. Assessing Officer [AO] u/s. 271B of the Act vide order dated 13.02.2023. The said penalty is levied for failure to get accounts audited and filing of Tax Report Audit u/s 44AB within stipulated time.
The impugned penalty stem from the fact that the assessee filed return of income on 16.03.2018 along with statutory audit report as against due date of 31.10.2017. The Ld. AO levied impugned penalty on the ground that the assessee could not establish reasonable cause. During appellate proceedings, the assessee submitted that audit report was made available to Ld. AO during assessment proceedings and therefore, penalty is not leviable as held by Chennai Tribunal in Vellakovil Primary Agricultural Co-operative Bank Ltd. (ITA No.49/Chny/2023 & ors. dated 23.06.2023). The assessee also submitted that it being a Primary Agricultural Cooperative Society was maintaining books of accounts as per Tamil Nadu Cooperative Society Act, 1983. As per the by-laws, statutory audit was mandatory. The statutory audit report dated 31.10.2017 was received by the assessee during February, 2018 from Assistant Director of Co-operative Society, Udhagamandalam. The Tax Audit Report and return of income could be filed only upon receipt of statutory audit report. However, rejecting the same, Ld. CIT(A) confirmed the penalty against which the assessee is in further appeal before us.
From the facts, it emerges that the assessee is Primary Agricultural Cooperative Society. It has to maintain books of accounts as per Tamil Nadu Cooperative Society Act, 1983. As per the by-laws, statutory audit is mandatory for the society. The statutory audit report dated 31.10.2017 has been received by the assessee during February, 2018 from Assistant Director of Co-operative Society, Udhagamandalam. It is only upon receipt of the Statutory Audit Report, the assessee could have filed Tax Audit Report and return of income. Therefore, the delay could not be attributed to the assessee. The Tax Audit Report was duly furnished during the course of assessment proceedings. Under such circumstances, the impugned penalty could not be levied for mere venial breach without there being any mala-fide intention on the part of the assessee. The cited decision of the Tribunal is in similar lines and favors the case of the assessee. Respectfully following the same, we delete the impugned penalty. 4. The appeal stand allowed. Order pronounced in open court on 28th November, 2023.
More judgments on Section 271B
- Devayatbhai Kalotara, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-2, RajkotITA 679/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Waghire College Saswad, Pune vs ITO, Ward 14(5), PuneITA 2867/PUN/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Waghire College Saswad, Pune vs ITO, Ward 14(5), PuneITA 2866/PUN/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Waghire College Saswad, Pune vs ITO, Ward 14(5), PuneITA 2865/PUN/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Waghire College Saswad, Pune vs ITO, Ward 14(5), PuneITA 2864/PUN/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Sita Enterprises vs. Office Of The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026
- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026