M/S VASOO BUILDERS PRIVATE LIMITED,BANGALORE vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-7(1)(2), BANGALORE

PDF · subscribers
ITA 240/BANG/2023Status: HeardITAT Bangalore16 May 2023AY 2014-154 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal, considering the assessee's plea for another opportunity and the fact that the AO made additions of the entire expenditure and liabilities without allowing any benefit, decided to remit the appeal back to the AO for de novo assessment.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed a return of income declaring NIL income and did not respond to statutory notices issued by the Assessing Officer (AO). Consequently, the AO passed an ex parte assessment order. The assessee also failed to appear before the CIT(Appeals), leading to the dismissal of their appeal.

What were the issues?

Whether an ex parte assessment order passed due to non-compliance by the assessee should be set aside to provide an opportunity for fresh assessment, especially when the assessee claims non-receipt of notices.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 143(3),Section 144

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH : BANGALORE

Before: SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K. & SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU

For Appellant: Shri Ravishankar S.V., Advocate
For Respondent: Shri Sunil Kumar Singh, CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Hearing: 16.05.2023Pronounced: 16.05.2023

Date of hearing : 16.05.2023 Date of Pronouncement : 16.05.2023 O R D E R

Per Laxmi Prasad Sahu, Accountant Member

1.

This appeal by the assessee is against the order dated 1.2.2023 of the CIT(Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [NFAC] for the assessment year 2014-15.

2.

The sole issue arising out of the various grounds raised by the assessee is the ex parte assessment order u/s. 143(3) r.w.s. 144 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 [the Act] passed by the Assessing Officer which was upheld by the CIT(Appeals).

3.

The brief facts of the case are that the assessee filed return of income on 19.11.2015 declaring NIL income. The case was selected for scrutiny under CASS and statutory notices were issued to the assessee. The case was fixed for hearing on different dates, but the assessee did not respond to the notices. Finally the AO provided one more opportunity by issue of notice in respect of which also the assessee did not appear. Therefore, the AO completed the assessment u/s. 144 and determined the income at Rs.34,60,48,310.

4.

On appeal, the CIT(Appeals) fixed the case for hearings on various dates, but nobody appeared nor any written submissions were filed. Hence the CIT(Appeals) dismissed the appeal of the assessee. Aggrieved, the assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal.

5.

The ld. AR submitted that the notices of hearing issued by the CIT(A) were not received and therefore the assessee could represent its case. He also submitted that there is no Managing Director in this company and therefore the appeal form is signed by Director of the company, Shri B. Sagar Muthappa. The ld. AR therefore requested for one more opportunity to the assessee to represent its case in the interest of justice and he undertook to produce all the necessary documents required before the AO for fresh assessment. The ld. DR had no objection to the same.

6.

After hearing both the parties and going through the order of assessment, we note that the AO has provided many opportunities to the assessee, but the assessee did not respond. The AO has passed the ex parte assessment order u/s. 144 by making addition of the entire expenditure debited to the Profit & Loss account and total liability shown in the balance sheet and no benefit of expenditure has been allowed to the assessee. We also note that the assessee has not availed the several opportunities of hearing granted by the CIT(Appeals). Considering the prayer of the ld. AR of the assessee and the totality of facts of the case, in the interest of justice, we remit the appeal to the Assessing Officer for de novo assessment with costs of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) payable by the assessee. Copy of payment challan of costs shall be produced before the AO. The assessee is directed to produce all the necessary documents to substantiate its case and cooperate in the proceedings before the AO without seeking unnecessary adjournments for early disposal of the case. The AO shall grant effective opportunities of hearing to the assessee and decide the case afresh in accordance with law. It is ordered accordingly.

7.

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.

Pronounced in the open court on this 16th day of May, 2023.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →