PRAVEEN KUMAR KAMALAMMA CHIKANARASIMHAIAH,BANGALORE vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(2)(2), BENGALURU

PDF
ITA 284/BANG/2023Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore21 June 2023AY 2017-183 pages

No AI summary yet for this case.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C’’ BENCH: BANGALORE

Before: SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI & SMT. BEENA PILLAI

For Appellant: Shri Chaitanya V. Mudrabettu, A.R
For Respondent: Smt. Priyadarshini Besaganni, D.R
Hearing: 21.06.2023Pronounced: 21.06.2023

PER CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:

This appeal by assessee is directed against order of NFAC passed u/s 250 of the Income-tax Act,1961 ['the Act' for short] for the assessment year 2017-18 dated 2.2.2023. The assessee has raised various grounds of appeal.

2.

There was a delay of 2 days in filing appeal before this Tribunal. The assessee has filed petition accompanied with an affidavit explaining reasons for delay in filing this appeal before this Tribunal. Considering the short delay of 2 days and also the reason explained by the assessee, we condone the delay of 2 days and admit the appeal for adjudication.

ITA No.284/Bang/2023 Praveen Kumar Kamalamma Chikkanarasimhaiah, Bangalore

Page 2 of 3 3. After hearing both the parties, in this case assessment order has been passed ex-parte u/s 144 of the Act without participation of the assessee on 26.12.2019. The assessee has carried the appeal before NFAC. The NFAC has given an opportunity to the assessee for hearing and the same was not complied by the assessee as below”

S.No. Notice issue date Date of compliance Response of (through ITBA) appellant 1. 11.03.2020 20.03.2020 No written submission 2. 05.08.2020 13.08.2020 filed in support 3. 29.01.2021 04.02.2021 of grounds of 4. 11.01.2023 17.01.2023 appeal. No and and request of 5. 18.01.2023 25.01.2023 adjournment made.

3.1 It was explained before us that assessee was not conversant with ITBA portal and as such assessee was not able to represent the case before NFAC. We find merit in the argument of the assessee’s counsel. Accordingly, in the interest of justice, we remit the entire issue to the file of AO for fresh consideration and at this stage, we refrain from going into the issue raised by the assessee on merit.

4.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced in the open court on 21st June, 2023

Sd/- Sd/- (Beena Pillai) (Chandra Poojari) Judicial Member Accountant Member

Bangalore, Dated 21st June, 2023. VG/SPS

ITA No.284/Bang/2023 Praveen Kumar Kamalamma Chikkanarasimhaiah, Bangalore

Page 3 of 3 Copy to:

1.

The Applicant 2. The Respondent 3. The CIT 4. The CIT(Judicial) 5. The DR, ITAT, Bangalore. 6. Guard file By order

Asst. Registrar, ITAT, Bangalore.

PRAVEEN KUMAR KAMALAMMA CHIKANARASIMHAIAH,BANGALORE vs INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(2)(2), BENGALURU | BharatTax