SHRI VIJAY KUMAR S/O SHRI BRIJ LAL,BATHINDA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD- 2 (1), BATHINDA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal noted that the assessee had opted for the Vivad se Vishwas scheme and received Form 3. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order of the CIT(A). During the hearing, the assessee's counsel submitted an application for withdrawal of the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn due to the assessee opting for the Vivad se Vishwas scheme.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Assessee by : None (Withdrawal Application) Revenue by : Shri G.S. Bali, DR Date of Hearing : 22/06/2021 Date of Pronouncement : 22/06/2021 Order PER N.K. SAINI, VICE PRESIDENT:
This is an appeal filed by the Assessee against the order of the Ld. CIT(A), Bathinda dt. 05/03/2019.
During the course of hearing nobody was present on behalf of the assessee. However the Ld. Counsel of the Assessee has furnished an application for withdrawal of this appeal stating therein as under:
Ref: Appeal No. ITA 412/ASR/2019 Assessment Year 2010-11 Sh Vijay Kumar Vs. Income Tax Officer Ward 2(1) Bathinda Sub: Application for withdrawal of the above said appeal Sir, Most respectfully it is brought to your kind attention that assessee has opted for The direct tax Vivad se Vishwash scheme and form no. 3 with acknowledgment no. 978410870311220 dt. 31.12.2020 has been received. Now the assessee want to withdraw the above said appeal and for this the necessary information is given through this letter.
Kindly Note & oblige Thanking You Yours faithfully
Sd/- Vijay Kumar P.P. Maheshwary S/o Sh Brij Lal Advocate Counsel for assessee
In the present case, it is noticed that the assessee has availed the immunity scheme i.e; Vivad Se Vishwas and the Income Tax Department has since issued Form 3 bearing certificate no. 978410870311220, in response to the application filed by the assessee, under section 5(1) of the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020, therefore the appeal of the assessee is to be dismissed as withdrawn.
The Ld. DR did not object if appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
In view of the above the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order pronounced on 22/06/2021.
More judgments on Section 5(1)
- Bajrang Singh Rajawat, Jaipur vs ITO Ward-7(2), JaipurITA 1120/JPR/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed30 Jul 2026AY 2014-15
- Krrishraj Construction Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Central Circle-3, SuratITA 1232/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed4 May 2026AY 2016-17
- Krrishraj Construction Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The ACIT, Central Circle-3, SuratITA 1231/SRT/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed4 May 2026AY 2015-16
- Amit Satpathy, Mumbai vs ITO-42(2)(1), MumbaiITA 5930/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed27 Feb 2026AY 2017-18
- Amish Anantrai Modi, Mumbai vs Central Circel 2(1), MumbaiITA 6281/MUM/2025[2011-2012]Status: Disposed9 Dec 2025AY 2011-2012
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Laxman Singh Yadav vs. Bank Of BarodaMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Surendra Singh Rathore vs. Idfc First Bank Through Branch ManagerMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026
- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026