THE DCIT, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. M/S MIRACLE SOFTWARE SYSREM (I) PVT. LTD., VISAKHAPATNAM
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal observed that the tax effect was below the threshold specified in CBDT Circular No. 17/2019 and its clarifications. Therefore, the appeal was not maintainable as per the circulars.
What were the facts?
The Revenue Department filed an appeal before the ITAT against an order of the CIT(A) for the assessment year 2008-09. The tax effect involved in the appeal was below the monetary limit prescribed by CBDT circulars for filing appeals.
What were the issues?
Whether the Revenue's appeal is maintainable before the ITAT given the tax effect involved and the prevailing CBDT circulars on monetary limits for appeals.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, VISAKHAPATNAM BENCH, VISAKHAPATNAM
Before: SHRI N.K. CHOUDHRY, HON’BLE & SHRI D.S. SUNDER SINGH, HONBLE
O R D E R PER BENCH
This appeal has been preferred by the Revenue Department against the order dated 30/10/2014 impugned herein passed by the ld.Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [for short, “ld. Commissioner”], Visakhapatnam u/sec. 250(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "Act") for the A.Y. 2008-09.
(M/s. Miracle Software Systems (I) Pvt. Ltd.)
At the outset it is observed that tax effect involved in the appeal under consideration is neither more than Rs. 50 lacs nor the case is based upon any of the exceptions prescribed in CBDT Circular No.17/2019, dated 08.08.2019 read with Circular No.03/2018, whereby the Revenue Department is precluded from filing the appeal before appellate tribunal against the order of ld. Commissioner, in which the tax effect does not exceed Rs.50,00,000/- as specified in the Circular and the CBDT Clarification dated 20th August 2019 whereby it is clarified that revised monetary limits so mentioned in the circular 17/2019 is applicable to all pending SLPs/Appeals/ Cross Objections/ References. Hence the instant appeal deserves dismissal as withdrawn being not maintainable.
In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue Department stands dismissed as withdrawn.
Order Pronounced in open Court on this 24th day of June, 2021. sd/- sd/- (D.S. SUNDER SINGH) (N.K. CHOUDHRY) Accountant Member Judicial Member Dated: 24th June, 2021. vr/-
(M/s. Miracle Software Systems (I) Pvt. Ltd.)
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Tvl. Annai Garden vs. The Commercial Tax Officer / The State Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Yadeshwar Mallekedi vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 15 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Das vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Superwealth Financial Enterprises Private Limited, Khordha vs. Joint Commissioner Good And Service Tax Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Simanchal Sahoo vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026