DINESH KUMAR PAHUJA,ALLAHABAD vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, ALLAHABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and the application was approved. Therefore, the appeal was considered not maintainable.
What were the facts?
The assessee had appealed an order from the CIT(A) for the assessment year 2013-14. During the hearing, the assessee's counsel stated that the assessee had opted for the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, and the department had approved the application by issuing Form No. 5.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the appeal was maintainable after the assessee opted for and was approved under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ALLAHABAD BENCH ALLAHABAD
Before: SHRI.VIJAY PAL RAO & SHRI RAMIT KOCHAR
PER SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
This appeal of the assessee is directed against the order dated 02.12.2019 of CIT(A)-III, Lucknow for the A.Y. 2013-14. 2. At the time of hearing, ld. Counsel for the assessee has stated at bar that the assessee has already opted for Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and the application of the assessee has been approved by the Department by issuing Form No.
The assessee has also filed the application dated 25.02.2021 for withdrawal of the appeal. Ld. Counsel has referred to the Form No.5 issued by the Pr. CIT (Central), Dinesh Kumar Pahuja
Lucknow and submitted that the appeal of the assessee may be allowed to be
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- A.Merchy Clara vs. The Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise (Appeals)Madras · 13 Oct 2026
- Nallathambi Thangaraj vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IMadras · 13 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S. Hira Films PVT. LTD. vs. M/S. Prasad Film Labs (Mumbai) Private LimitedBombay · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Jung Bahadur Singh, Through Its Proprietor, Jang Bahadur Singh vs. The Union Of INDIA, Through Its Secretary, Ministry Of Finance, Department Of RevenueJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026