Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Detected automatically from the text. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, [ DEHRADUN CIRCUIT BENCH: DEHRADUN ]
Before: SHRI SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVASHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI
O R D E R PER PRASHANT MAHARISHI, A. M.
This appeal is filed by the Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation) Circle-2, Dehradun, for assessment year 2012-13, raising several grounds of appeal.
The total income declared by the assessee in the return of income is Rs.7,87,01,991/- and total income computed by the Assessing Officer is Rs.8,54,75,129/-. The tax computed on income of the assessee is @ 42%. On appeal before the ld. CIT (Appeals) the appeal of the assessee was partly allowed. Thus, considering the fact that assessee in its return of income has admitted that there is a permanent establishment in India the tax involved in the above appeal is not above the prescribed tax effect for filing appeal before the Tribunal by the Revenue. Thus, as such, the appeal of the ld. Assessing Officer is subject to dismissal as low tax effect appeal.
Anyway, the only issue involved in this appeal is that whether the receipt on account of Service Tax is includible in gross revenue for the purpose of Section 44BB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act).
The ld. AR, at the time of hearing, submitted that the appeal of the Revenue is liable to be dismissed on account of low tax appeal.
The ld. DR looking at the figure of the returned income and the assessed income agreed with the same.