M/S HARSHA CONSTRUCTIONS RATIONAL CONSTRUCTION,ALLAHABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1, ALLAHABAD

ITA 29/ALLD/2020Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad16 March 2021AY 2014-152 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal allowed the assessee to withdraw the appeal. Consequently, the appeal filed by the assessee was dismissed as withdrawn.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal against the CIT(A)'s order for AY 2014-15. At the time of hearing, the assessee's counsel requested to withdraw the appeal due to the smallness of the issue involved.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was whether the assessee wished to pursue the appeal. The assessee decided not to pursue the appeal due to the minor nature of the issue.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ALLAHABAD BENCH ‘SMC’ ALLAHABAD

Before: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO

For Appellant: Shri Praveen Godbole, CA
For Respondent: Shri A.K. Singh, Sr. D.R
Hearing: 22/03/2021Pronounced: 22/03/2021

This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order dated 03.12.2019 of CIT(A) for the assessment year 2014-15. 2. At the time of hearing, the Ld. counsel for the assessee has stated at Bar that due to smallness of the issue involved in this appeal the assessee does not want to pursue the present appeal and the same may be allowed to be withdrawn. He has also filed a letter dated 22.03.2021. On the other hand, the Ld. DR has raised no objection if the present appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.

3.

Accordingly, in view of the statement of Ld. counsel for the assessee as well as the letter

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →