DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(3), BENGALURU vs. SRI. VINOD KASHYAP, NEW DELHI

At the outset, we notice that the Bangalore Bench of the Tribunal does have jurisdiction to entertain this appeal since the Situs of the AO who passed the order is in Delhi. The Hon’ble Apex Cout’s judgment in the case of ABC Papers Ltd., (reported in 447 ITR 1) and MSPL Ltd., (reported in 454 ITR 280) had categorically held that jurisdiction of the Tribunal and / or jurisdiction of the Hon’ble High Court would depend upon the Situs of the AO who passed the Assessment Order and same is unaffected by the transfer of jurisdiction under section 127 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The gist of the judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court and the relevant paras are as under:

Relevant Decision Summary Para Order u/s 127 since it is relatable only to the jurisdiction of the Income-tax Authorities and has no bearing on the ITAT and High Court. As a matter of principle, transfer of a case from one judicial forum to another judicial forum, without the intervention of a Court Hon'ble of law is against the independence of judiciary. Supreme Court in ABC Papers Accordingly, appeals against every decision of the ITAT shall lie only Para 31 Ltd., (reported before the High Court within whose jurisdiction the AO who passed and 33 in 447 ITR 1) the assessment order is situated. Even if the case or cases of an assessee are transferred in exercise of power under section 127 of the Act, the High Court/ ITAT within whose jurisdiction the Assessing Officer has passed the order, shall continue to exercise the jurisdiction of appeal. This principle is applicable even if the transfer is under section 127 for the same assessment year(s). Relying upon decision of Hon'ble SC in ABC Papers Ltd. (supra), the Hon'ble SC held that jurisdiction of ITAT and/or jurisdiction of the concerned High Court would depend upon the situs of AO who passed the assessment order. Hon'ble Supreme Court in MSPL Ltd. Para 3 (reported in 454 and 6 ITR 280)