HIREN CHAMPAKLAL PATEL,SURAT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD -2(3)(2), SURAT
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee prayed for withdrawal of the appeal and the Departmental Representative had no objection. Consequently, the appeal was treated as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee opted for the benefit of the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020. The assessee filed Form-3 under the scheme and prayed for withdrawal of the appeal.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the appeal should be withdrawn by the assessee under the Vivad Se Vishwas scheme.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, SURAT BENCH, SURAT
Before: SHRI PAWAN SINGH, JM & DR. A. L. SAINI, AM
O R D E R
PER DR. A. L. SAINI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
At the outset itself, Shri Hiren Vepari, learned counsel for the assessee, submitted before the Bench that assessee has opted the benefit of the “Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020”. A copy of Form-3 under ‘the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, filed by the assessee in the Income Tax Department on 13.12.2020 issued by Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Surat-1, was also placed before the Bench. Shri Hiren Vepari, CA, on behalf of the assessee, by way of a letter dated 01.01.2021, submitted that assessee prayed for withdrawal of the appeal to which, the learned Departmental Representative (DR) did not raise any objection.
We have heard both the parties and gone through Form-3 filed by the assessee to obtain the benefit of ‘Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme’ and noted that assessee has prayed for withdrawal of the appeal. The Ld. DR for the Revenue did not have any objection if the said appeal is withdrawn by the assessee. Consequently, we treat this appeal as withdrawn.
ITA 256/SRT/2018 Assessment Year:2014-15 Hiren Champaklal Patel 3. In the result, the appeal of the assessee (in AY.2014-15) is dismissed as withdrawn.
Order is pronounced on 07/01/2021, as per Rule 34 of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Rule 1963.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- N.K Fashion Through It Proprietor Mr. Narender Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Delhi EastDelhi · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetanj Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Namita Behera vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Ratul Boro vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026