MR .AKSHAT DONERIA,NOIDA vs. ITO 4(1), AGRA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that non-receipt of notices due to a change of address, which was duly intimated, constitutes a reasonable cause for non-compliance. Therefore, the penalty levied under section 271(1)(b) should not be imposed.
What were the facts?
The assessee failed to comply with notices issued under section 142(1) of the Income Tax Act. The assessee had changed his address and informed the department, but notices were sent to the old address and not received.
What were the issues?
Whether a penalty under section 271(1)(b) can be sustained when the non-compliance was due to the assessee not receiving notices because of an uncommunicated change of address.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AGRA BENCH ‘SMC-3’ : AGRA
Before: SHRI SHAMIM YAHYA, & SHRI YOGESH KUMAR US
ORDER
PER SHAMIM YAHYA, AM :
This appeal by the assessee for the assessment year 2011-12 is directed against the order dated 29.12.2017 of Learned CIT(A)-2, Agra.
The solitary issue raised by the assessee in the Appeal is relating to sustaining the penalty of Rs. 10,000/- u/s. 271(1)(b) of the Act.
The brief facts of the case are that during the assessment proceedings on the notices issued under section 142(1) of the Act by the Assessing Officer, no compliance was made by the assessee and due to non-cooperation and willful default by the assessee, AO imposed the penalty under section 271(1)(b) of the Act vide order dated 07.04.2014. Aggrieved with the aforesaid penalty order, the assessee appealed before the Ld. CIT(A)-2, Agra, who vide his impugned exparte order dated 29.12.2017 has sustained the penalty in dispute. Against the order of the Ld. CIT(A)-2, Agra, now the assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal. 4. At the time of hearing, Ld. AR for the assessee submitted that the assessee filed the return with the ITO, Ward 4(1), Agra and at that time the assessee was residing at “Flat No. B-5, Kripa Dham Complex, Fatehabad Road, Tajganj, Agra and the notice u/s. 143(3) of the Act dated 25.9.2012 was issued and served on that address and on the date fixed for compliance, the AR of the assessee appeared and the case was then adjourned sine die. It was further submitted that in between the assessee alongwith his family permanently shifted to NOIDA at Star Court 8/1902, Jaypee Greens, Gold Course, Surajpur Kasna Road, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh-201306, which intimation was given to the Income Tax Department, which is evident from the letter issued by the Income Tax PAN Services Unit, Pune bearing reference No. F.No. DIT(E).PAN/ITMN_REG, PKGID:PCI/0016/18-04-2013/FFL, KNP/80/8810302090760801111/90223254, a copy of which is placed on record and also the assessee sent a letter on 17.3.2013 informing the change of his address. It is further submitted that despite such change of address notified to the Income Tax Department, the AO continued to send the notices on the old address of the assessee and thus these were never received by him and accordingly he could not make compliance to such notice for bonafide reasons and hence, the assessee was denied proper opportunity to defend his case properly and judiciously, for none of his fault. He further submitted that in accordance with sub section (1) of section 274 no order imposing a penalty under chapter shall be made unless the assessee has been heard, or has been given a reasonable opportunity of being heard. It was further submitted that it is evident from the order u/s. 271(1)(b) of the Act dated 7.3.2014 that the AO had sent the show cause notice u/s. 271(1)(b) of the Act dated 20.12.2013 for the alleged non compliance of notice u/s. 142(1) of the Act dated 17.10.2013 fixing the date of compliance on 29.10.2013 not on the correct address i.e. Star Court 8/1902, Jaypee Greens, Gold Course, Surajpur Kasna Road, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh-201306, which was available address mentioned in the PAN data base of the assessee and thus the same was not received by the assesse and therefore, he could not make the compliance of the same, hence, the assessee was prevented
More judgments on Section 271(1)(b)
- Navanitbhai Gordhanbhai Bhuva, Surat vs ITO, Ward 3(3)(1), SuratITA 1195/SRT/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Navanitbhai Gordhanbhai Bhuva, Surat vs ITO, Ward 3(3)(1), SuratITA 1194/SRT/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Navanitbhai Gordhanbhai Bhuva, Surat vs ITO, Ward 3(3)(1), SuratITA 1193/SRT/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Laxmi Narain Kesarwani, Delhi vs DCIT, Central Circle-20, New DelhiITA 4432/DEL/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Laxminarain Kesarwani, Delhi vs DCIT, Central Circel-20, New DelhiITA 4431/DEL/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Prabhudatta Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs. Joint Commissioner Of GST (Appeal), Territorial Range, BolangirOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Attitude Exim PVT. LTD., Rourkela vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Pradeep Kumar Mahapatra, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent Bhubaneswar-Iii Circle, CGST Range, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026