GANGA RATAN DEVELOPERS,AGRA vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX-1, AGRA, AGRA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal, noting that the Revenue had no objection, permitted the withdrawal of the appeal. Therefore, the appeal filed by the assessee was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax under Section 263. The assessee submitted that no adverse inference was drawn by the Assessing Officer in the original proceedings.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee's appeal against a revisionary order under Section 263 should be dismissed as withdrawn when the assessee requests withdrawal and the Revenue has no objection.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AGRA BENCH, ‘DB’: AGRA
Before: SHRI SHAMIM YAHYA & SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA
ORDER PER SHAMIM YAHYA, AM,
This appeal by the assessee is against the order of the Ld. CIT-1, Agra, passed u/s 263 of the Act dated 31.03.2023 and pertains to Assessment Year 2017-18.
At the outset, in this case, the ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that this appeal was filed by the assessee against the order u/s 263 of the Act passed by the Ld. Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax. He also submitted that in the proceedings conducted by the Ld. Assessing Officer and the consequent order passed by him u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 263, no adverse inference has been drawn by the Ld. Assessing Officer. Hence, the assessee wants to withdraw the present appeal filed against the revisionary order passed u/s 263 of the Act. In this regard, an application of withdrawal dated 30.06.2023 is also available on record.
Upon careful consideration, noting that the Revenue does not have any objection, we permit the withdrawal of the appeal. Hence, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 28.08.2023.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Prabhudatta Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs. Joint Commissioner Of GST (Appeal), Territorial Range, BolangirOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Attitude Exim PVT. LTD., Rourkela vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Pradeep Kumar Mahapatra, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent Bhubaneswar-Iii Circle, CGST Range, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026