← Back to search

SQUARE DOTCOM PROVATE LIMITED,GURGAON vs. ACIT CIRCLE-24(1), NEW DELHI

PDF
ITA 245/DEL/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 July 20252 pages

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘H’: NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI PRAKASH CHAND YADAV & SHRI MANISH AGARWALM/s Square Dotcom Private Limited, 9th Floor, Good Earth Business Bay, Sector-58, Gurgaon, Harayan-122011

Hearing: 23/07/2025Pronounced: 30/07/2025

PER PRAKASH CHAND YADAV, JM:

The present appeal of the assessee is arising out from the order of Ld.
Assessing
Officer dated
13th
February,
2021
having
DIN
No.
ITBA/AST/S/143(3)2020-21/1030628110(1) and relates to Asst. Year 2016-17. 2. At the outset, Ld. Counsel for the assessee pointed out that the transaction between assessee and its AE’s was out of the purview of international transaction in as much as the assessee has only issued equity share to its associated enterprises (AE), in lieu of the share capital received from AE. It is the contention of the assessee that this transaction does not have any bearing on the profits of the company and, therefore, it is out of the purview of international transaction and hence, no transfer pricing adjustment can be made qua this transaction.

3.

Per contra, Ld. CR relied pointed out that this plea of the assessee is completely new plea and has not been raised before the lower authorities. Ld. Square Dotcom Private Limited vs. ACIT, Circle-24(1)

DR was pointed out that before the lower authorities, the assessee has disputed the method of valuation applied towards the value of equity shares. Ld DR averted that since it is new plea it cannot be entertained herewith as new facts are to be brought on record.

4.

We have heard the rival submission and perused the material available on record. So far as the contention of the DR vis-à-vis admissibility of new plea, we are of the view that a legal plea can be raised at any time of the appellate proceedings, provided all material facts should be on record. In this case the only fact is required to be seen is whether the assessee has actually issued shares only to its AE. Therefore, we are admitting this aspect and remitting the matter back to the file of Ld. TPO for deciding this plea. Ld. TPO will examine the nature of the transaction entered with its AE and then decide the issue in accordance with law. Needless to say, that TPO will provide meaningful opportunities to the assessee before passing any order.

5.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open court on 30/07/2025. (MANISH AGARWAL) (PRAKASH CHAND YADAV) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER

Dated: 30/07/2025
PK/Ps

SQUARE DOTCOM PROVATE LIMITED,GURGAON vs ACIT CIRCLE-24(1), NEW DELHI | BharatTax