SYED WARISUDDIN NAVEED,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), HYDERABAD

PDF
ITA 275/HYD/2026Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad27 March 2026AY 2023-2429 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

Facts

The assessee's return for AY 2023-24 was filed after a search operation. During assessment, unexplained cash and investments related to land purchase and development were noted. The assessee offered part of the unexplained amount as income, but the AO made additions under Sections 69A and 69 of the IT Act, and taxed an amount under Section 115BBE.

Held

The Tribunal admitted the assessee's additional ground challenging the validity of the assessment order. It held that the approval granted by the Addl.CIT/JCIT under Section 148B was mechanical and without application of mind, rendering the assessment order invalid, following various High Court and Supreme Court precedents.

Key Issues

Whether the assessment order passed under Section 143(3) is vitiated due to mechanical approval granted by the Addl.CIT/JCIT under Section 148B without application of mind.

Sections Cited

69, 69A, 115BBE, 143(3), 148B, 132, 132(4)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad “B” Bench, Hyderabad

Hearing: 23.03.2026Pronounced: 27.03.2026

Digitally signed by TIRUPATI TIRUPATI YAMINI YAMINI NAGA MALLESWARI NAGA MALLESWARI Date: 2026.03.27 17:31:27 +05'30'

Sr. Private Secretary ITAT, Hyderabad

SYED WARISUDDIN NAVEED,HYDERABAD vs DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2), HYDERABAD | BharatTax