RAGHUNATH REDDY GANGARAM,HYDERABAD vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2),, HYDERABAD

PDF
ITA 232/HYD/2026Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad27 March 2026AY 2023-2429 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

Facts

The assessee's case was selected for scrutiny following a search operation. The Assessing Officer (A.O.) made additions based on unexplained investments in property and cash found. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) sustained these additions. The assessee appealed to the Tribunal, raising an additional ground that the assessment order was vitiated due to a mechanical approval under Section 148B.

Held

The Tribunal admitted the additional ground, holding that the approval under Section 148B by the Additional CIT/JCIT was mechanical and lacked application of mind, as evidenced by the brief approval order and the short time taken. Consequently, the assessment order was deemed invalid.

Key Issues

Whether the assessment order passed under Section 143(3) is vitiated due to mechanical approval under Section 148B without application of mind by the approving authority.

Sections Cited

69, 115BBE, 143(3), 148B, 132, 69A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad “B” Bench, Hyderabad

Hearing: 23.03.2026Pronounced: 27.03.2026

Digitally signed by TIRUPATI TIRUPATI YAMINI YAMINI NAGA MALLESWARI NAGA MALLESWARI Date: 2026.03.27 17:31:27 +05'30'

Sr. Private Secretary ITAT, Hyderabad

RAGHUNATH REDDY GANGARAM,HYDERABAD vs DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2),, HYDERABAD | BharatTax