SAURAV JEWELLERS P. LTD.,MUMBAI vs. DY CIT -CC-4(2), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal admitted the error and corrected the previous order. The disallowance on account of making charges amounting to Rs.49,83,491/- for AY 2014-15 was directed to be deleted.
What were the facts?
The assessee pointed out a typographical error in a previous ITAT order. The order incorrectly stated that a disallowance was made instead of deleted.
What were the issues?
Correction of a typographical error in a previous tribunal order regarding the deletion of a disallowance.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
The assessee’s authorised representative vide letter dated 29/12/2022 had brought to our attention that in para 3.14 of our order in A.Y.2014-15 dated 28/10/2022, this Tribunal had made a typographical error.
998/Mum/2021, 2504/Mum/2021 M/s. Saurav Jewellers Pvt. Ltd.
We have gone through the said letter and find substance in the same and admit that there is a typographical error for which this corrigendum is hereby issued.
As rightly stated by the assessee, this Tribunal had deleted the disallowance made on account of making charges amounting to Rs.49,83,491/- for A.Y.2014-15. But, however, while concluding in para 3.14, this Tribunal had erroneously mentioned the word “disallowed” instead of “deleted”. Accordingly, the revised para 3.14 shall be read as under:-
“3.14. In view of the above, the disallowance made on account of making charges amounting to Rs.49,83,491/- for A.Y.2014-15 is hereby directed to be deleted. Accordingly, the ground Nos.2 & 3 raised by the assessee are allowed.”
All other contents of the Tribunal order dated 28/10/2022 shall remain unchanged. This corrigendum shall be read as part and parcel of the earlier Tribunal order dated 28/10/2022.
Sd/- Sd/- (AMIT SHUKLA) (M.BALAGANESH) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Mumbai; Dated 03/01/2023 KARUNA, sr.ps
998/Mum/2021, 2504/Mum/2021 M/s. Saurav Jewellers Pvt. Ltd.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of Hte Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Kotdwar Steel Limited vs. Office Of The Deputy CommissionerUttarakhand · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Govindjee Dairy Milk Private Limited vs. Central Goods And Services TaxRajasthan · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026