DR. AROTI GHOSH,ALLAHABAD vs. ITO, WARD-1(1), ALLAHABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal restored the matter to the AO for fresh consideration, directing the assessee to provide all relevant evidence to claim exemption under Section 10(38) for long-term capital gains on sale of shares.
What were the facts?
The assessee had undisclosed long-term capital gains from share transactions. The Assessing Officer (AO) made additions, and the assessee filed a rectification application which was rejected. The CIT(A) dismissed the appeal against the rectification order.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee is entitled to exemption under Section 10(38) for long-term capital gains on sale of shares, and if the rectification application was rightly dismissed.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 10(38),Section 154,Section 147,Section 148,Section 143(3)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ALLAHABAD BENCH, ALLAHABAD
Before: SHRI ABY T. VARKEY & SHRI RAMIT KOCHAR
PER SHRI RAMIT KOCHAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER:
This appeal filed by assessee, arising out of the appellate order passed by learned Commissioner of Income-tax(Appeals) (National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC))(Din & Order No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2022-23/1045998109(1)), dated 27.09.2022 , for assessment year 2008-09, which appeal in turn has arisen out of the order dated 04.08.2016 passed by ld. Assessing Officer(hereinafter called “the AO”) u/s 154 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. 2. The assessee has raised following grounds of appeal in Memo of Appeal filed with Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Allahabad, which reads as under:- 1 A.Y. 2008-09 Dr. Aroti Ghosh “1. BECAUSE the learned Commissi
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 10(38)
- Shalin Jayantbhai Desai, Vadodara vs ACIT, Circle-4(2), Vadodara Present…ITA 2569/AHD/2026[2010-11]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2010-11
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2370/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Hetal Vinodchandra Sheth, Ahmedabad vs The ITO, Ward-5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2369/AHD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Karan Dilipkumar Patel L/H of Late… vs Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Vapi…ITA 353/SRT/2024[2011-12]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2011-12
- Jay Patel, Raipur vs ITO, Ward-3(1), RaipurITA 684/RPR/2026[2015-16]Status: Heard12 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S South INDIA Trading Company vs. Additional Commissioner Adjudication CGST Delhi North & Anr.Delhi · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Rishi Stonex vs. The State Of Assam And 5 OthersGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- Gopal Datt vs. Vishal Kumar SharmaUttarakhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Do Nam Enterprise And Anr vs. The Union Of INDIA And 2 OrsGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- M Sundaravel vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Central GST And Central ExciseMadras · 13 Oct 2026