HEALTHY LIVES FOUNDATION,DELHI vs. ITO WARD-5(1)(3), DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the Ld. CIT(E) had not decided the application on merits and restored the matter for fresh adjudication. The assessee was directed to provide necessary evidence for its activities.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the Ld. CIT(E) who denied permanent registration. The assessee submitted that the Ld. CIT(E) failed to consider their submissions and denied registration despite acknowledging its maintainability.
What were the issues?
Whether the Ld. CIT(E) properly adjudicated the assessee's application for permanent registration on merits and if the denial of registration was justified.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI “B” BENCH: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI YOGESH KUMAR U.S & SHRI MANISH AGARWAL
The present appeal is filed by the assessee against the order dated 22.11.2024 passed by Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Lucknow [“Ld.CIT(E)”] in Appeal No.CIT Exemption, Lucknow/2024-25/12AA/12166 pertaining to assessment year NIL.
The assessee has made the submissions in response to notice dated 18.10.2024, copy of which is filed in the Paper Book, submitted before us and submits that Ld.CIT(E) has failed to consider the same.
We have heard the contentions of the Ld. Authorized Representatives of the parties and perused the material available on record. Looking to the facts and also considering the submissions, We find that Ld.CIT(E) has not decided the application of the assessee on merits though he himself has stated that the assessee has been given the provisional registration therefore, the application filed by the assessee for permanent registration is maintainable but Ld.CIT(E) has denied the registration u/s 12AB(1)(b)(ii)(b) of the Act.
Under these facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice, the matter is restored to the file of Ld. CIT(E) for fresh adjudication on merits in accordance with law after giving reasonable opportunities to the assessee. The assessee is also directed to file the necessary evidences before the Ld. CIT(E) in order to establish the genuineness of its activity. With these directions, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the open Court on 31.07.2025.
More judgments on Section 12AB(1)(b)(ii)(b)
- Vocational Education Foundation, Delhi vs CIT (E), LucknowITA 6096/DEL/2026[-]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026
- Vocational Education Foundation, Uttar… vs CIT (Exempton), LucknowITA 6095/DEL/2026[-]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026
- Millenium Education Society, Hisar vs Income Tax Officer (Exemption), RohtakITA 4089/DEL/2026[2027-28]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2027-28
- Aimamedia Foundation, Meerut vs CIT (Exemption), DelhiITA 7457/DEL/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026AY 2026-27
- Baba Shiv Prakash Vradha Ashram Trust, Agra vs ITO Exemption, AgraITA 483/AGR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed19 Aug 2026AY 2025-26
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S. Sikka Motors PVT LTD vs. Union Of INDIA & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shri Yaras Suresh Babu Prabhu Kumar vs. The Union Of INDIATelangana · 27 Oct 2026
- Santa Singh vs. SuperintendentUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Azaad Builders vs. Assistant Commissioner SGSTUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026