ACIT-13(1)(2), MUMBAI vs. M/S PLAY GAMES 27X7 PVT. LTD., MUMBAI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that since the revision order passed by the PCIT was quashed by the ITAT, the assessment order passed in pursuance thereof became a nullity. Therefore, the CIT(A) was correct in dismissing the appeal proceedings before him.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against an order of the CIT(A) which dismissed the appeal proceedings. The CIT(A) had dismissed the appeal because the assessment order, passed under Section 143(3) r.w.s. 263, was based on a revision order that was subsequently quashed by the ITAT.
What were the issues?
Whether an assessment order passed pursuant to a revision order that is subsequently quashed is valid. The validity of the CIT(A)'s decision to dismiss the appeal based on the quashed revision order.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI ‘C’ BENCH, MUMBAI.
Before: Shri B.R. Baskaran (AM) & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale (JM)
The revenue has filed this appeal challenging the order dated 2013-14 passed by Ld CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi and it relates to the assessment year 2013- 14.
We notice that the impugned appellate order has been passed by Ld CIT(A) against the assessment order dated 21.12.2018 passed by the assessing officer u/s 143(3) r.w.s 263 of the Act in pursuance of directions given by Ld PCIT in his revision order dated 28.3.2018 passed u/s 263 of the Act.
The Ld CIT(A) noticed that the above said revision order passed by Ld PCIT was challenged by the assessee before the Tribunal and the ITAT, vide his order dated 31.05.2022 passed in has quashed the revision order passed by Ld PCIT. Accordingly, the Ld PCIT held that the assessment order passed by AO in pursuance of the revision order shall
2 Play Games 27X7 become redundant. Accordingly he dismissed the appeal proceedings. The revenue is aggrieved,
We heard the parties and perused the record. The impugned assessment order has been passed by the AO u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 263 of the Act in order to give effect to the revision order passed by Ld PCIT. The above said revision order has since been quashed by ITAT and hence the impugned assessment order shall become nullity in the eyes of law. Hence the Ld CIT(A) was right in law in holding that the appeal proceedings before him is liable to be dismissed, meaning thereby, the appeal of the assessee before him was allowed. Accordingly, we do not find any reason to interfere with the order passed by him.
In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed.
Pronounced in the open court on 31.1.2023.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shri Yaras Suresh Babu Prabhu Kumar vs. The Union Of INDIATelangana · 27 Oct 2026
- Santa Singh vs. SuperintendentUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Azaad Builders vs. Assistant Commissioner SGSTUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Ganesh Trimbak Saraf And Another vs. The State Of Maharashtra And AnotherBombay · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Monolith Resorts Private Limited vs. The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026