TECNIMONT PRIVATE LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. PRINCIPLE CIT-5, MUMBAI, MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The assessee sought to withdraw the appeal as the subsequent proceedings by the AO resolved the issues. The Tribunal permitted the assessee to withdraw the appeal.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against a revision order passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) under Section 263. Subsequently, the Assessing Officer (AO) passed an order giving effect to the Section 263 order, accepting the assessee's contentions without making any additions.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal is maintainable when the subsequent assessment order has resolved the issues raised in the revision order.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘E‘ BENCH
Before: SHRI ABY T VARKEY & SHRI M.BALAGANESH
आदेश / O R D E R PER M. BALAGANESH (A.M):
This appeal in A.Y.2016-17 preferred by the order against the revision order of the ld. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-5, Mumbai u/s.263 of the Act dated 12/03/2022 for the A.Y.2016-17.
This appeal was earlier heard on 28/11/2022. Later, at the time of perusal of the file, it was noticed that certain clarifications are required
M/s. Tecnimont Pvt. Ltd. from the ld. Counsel for the assessee. Accordingly, a clarification hearing was listed on 31/03/2023 i.e. today. At the time of hearing, the ld. Counsel for the assessee filed a letter dated 29/03/2023 addressed by the assessee company to the Bench stating that they are withdrawing the appeal.
The appeal before us is against the revision order passed by the ld. PCIT u/s.263 of the Act. The ld. PCIT had set aside certain issues to the file of the ld. AO for fresh examination. However, in the subsequent proceedings giving effect to Section 263 order, the ld. AO had accepted to the contentions of the assessee and passed the order u/s.143(3) r.w.s. 263 of the Act on 28/03/2023 without making any additions to the total income that had been already determined in the final assessment order dated 27/12/2019. These facts are stated by the assessee in this letter dated 29/03/2023. Accordingly, assessee had sought for withdrawal of the present appeal. In view of the aforesaid facts, we are permitting the assessee to withdraw the appeal filed before us.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is hereby dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced on 31/03/2023 in the open Court
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Santa Singh vs. SuperintendentUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Azaad Builders vs. Assistant Commissioner SGSTUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Shadab Malik vs. State Of U.P. And 2 OthersAllahabad · 26 Oct 2026
- Salman vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 26 Oct 2026
- Srilalitha Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026