No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “H” BENCH
Before: SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY & SHRI AMARJIT SINGHvk-vk-la- 474@eaqcbZ@2023 ¼fu-oa- 2014&15½
vihykFkhZ }kjk@Appellant by : Shri Rahul Hakani, Adv. izfroknh }kjk@Respondent by : Smt. Anne Varghese, Sr. AR lquokbZ dh frfFk@Date of hearing : 19/04/2023 ?kks”k.kk dh frfFk@Date of pronouncement : 25/04/2023 vkns’k/ ORDER
PER VIKAS AWASTHY, JM:
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as “the CIT(A)”) dated 21.12.2022, for the assessment year 2014-15.
P a g e | (A.Y.2014-15) KREDENCE MULTI TRADING LTD.
Shri Rahul Hakani appearing on behalf of the assessee submits that the grievance of assessee in appeal is against disallowance of Rs.33,57,250 u/s 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) r.w.r. 8D of the Income Tax Rules,1962 (hereinafter referred to as “the Rules”). The Ld. Authorised Representative (AR) submits that during the period relevant to the assessment year under appeal, the assessee has earned dividend income exempt from tax Rs.2,83,358/-. The assessee has made suo-moto disallowance of Rs.1,09,357/- u/s 14A of the Act. The Assessing Officer (AO) invoking the provisions of Rule 8D and made further disallowance of Rs.33,57,250/-. The CIT(A) has upheld the disallowance made by the AO. The Ld. AR submitted that short prayer of the assessee is that disallowance u/s 14A of the Act may be restricted to the exempt income earned.
On the other hand, Smt. Anne Varghese representing the Department vehemently defended the impugned order and prayed for dismissing appeal of the assessee. Both sides heard. It is an undisputed fact that the assessee has earned exempt income of Rs.2,83,358/- during the relevant period. The AO has computed total disallowance u/s 14A r.w.r. 8D at Rs.34,66,606/-. The assessee has suo-moto disallowed Rs.1,09,357/- u/s 14A of the Act. It is no more res-integra that disallowance u/s 14A r.w.r. 8D cannot be more than the exempt income earned during the relevant period. Therefore, we direct the AO to restrict disallowance to the extent of exempt income earned by the assessee during the period relevant to the assessment year under appeal. Needless to say, the AO shall consider suo-moto disallowance already made by the assessee while computing total disallowance.
P a g e | (A.Y.2014-15) KREDENCE MULTI TRADING LTD.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed, in terms aforesaid.
Order pronounced in the open court on Tuesday the 25th day of April 2023.