GHATKOPAR SAHAJIVAN CO-OP HOUSING SOCIETY LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEAL), MUMBAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 825/MUM/2023Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 May 2023AY 2016-20174 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the CIT(A) dismissed the appeal ex-parte without appreciating potential reasons for non-appearance and that principles of natural justice require a fresh opportunity. The order of the CIT(A) was set aside.

What were the facts?

The assessee, a co-operative housing society, filed a return of income for AY 2016-17 showing NIL income. The return was processed under section 143(1) resulting in an addition of Rs. 4,70,220. A rectification petition was rejected, and the appeal before the CIT(A) was dismissed for non-compliance with hearing notices.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(A) erred in dismissing the appeal without providing adequate opportunity of hearing and violating principles of natural justice.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 143(1),Section 154,Section 250

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” BENCH MUMBAI

Hearing: 23/05/2023Pronounced: 24/05/2023

ORDER

PER PAVAN KUMAR GADALE - JM:

1.

The assessee has filed an appeal against the order of Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [“Ld. CIT(A)”] passed under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the Act”) for the Assessment Year (“AY”) 2016-17. The assessee has raised following grounds of appeal:- 1. "CPC/ACIT 27(1), Mumbai has erred while making adhoc disallowance of Rs.470220/-in intimation u/s.143(1) and also in Rectification u/s.154.

2. Ghatkopar Sahajivan Co-operative Housing Society Ltd.

2. The above impugned disallowance is made due to faulty computerized processing of Income tax Return without appreciating the entire facts.

3.

The Ld. CIT (A), NFAC erred in dismissing appeal without giving adequate opportunity of hearing and submissions. The earlier two notices dated 5/2/21 and 24/6/21 were served during pandemic of covid and Hon'ble Supreme Court in Misc.application No.21of 2022 extended the time limit for all proceedings. 4. The Ld. CIT (A), NFAC also erred in fact that the natural justice has been violated as the appellant was not provided with the show cause notice. 5. The Ld. CIT (A) ought to have passed speaking order on merits and sufficient opportunity of hearings/submissions ought to have been granted to the appellant.” 2. The Brief facts of the case are that, the assessee is a co- operative housing society and works on principles of mutuality. The assessee has filed return of income for AY 2016-17 on 03.02.2018 disclosing a total income of Rs.NIL. The return of income was processed u/s 143(1) of the Act on 14.06.2018 and the assessed income was determined at Rs.4,70,220/-. Against the intimation U/sec143 (1) of the Act, the assessee has filed a rectification petition and it was rejected vide order u/s 154 of the Act dated 5-06-2020. 3. Aggrieved by the rectification order, the assessee has filed an appeal before the CIT(A), whereas the CIT(A) has considered the 3 Ghatkopar Sahajivan Co-operative Housing Society Ltd.

More judgments on Section 154

All 8,676 judgments and leading authorities on Section 154 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →