M/S. JANTA CONSTRUCTION CO.,E-47, ROAD NO.2B VKI AREA JAIPUR vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-4, JAIPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee no longer had any grievance as the relief was already provided. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn by the assessee.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the CIT(A)'s order. The assessee later submitted that the relief sought in the appeal had already been granted by the CIT(A) through a rectification order.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal is maintainable when the relief sought has already been granted by the lower appellate authority through rectification.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES,”A” JAIPUR
Before: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA. No. 1276/JP/2019
आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर न्यायपीठ] जयपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES,”A” JAIPUR Jh fot; iky jko] U;kf;d lnL; ,oa Jh foØe flag ;kno] ys[kk lnL; ds le{k BEFORE: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA. No. 1276/JP/2019 fu/kZkj.k o"kZ@Assessment Years : 2013-14 cuke M/s Janta Construction Co., The ACIT, Vs. E-47, Road No. 2B, VKI Area, Circle-4, Jaipur-302023 Jaipur ToLFkk;h ys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: AABFJ0003D vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@ Assessee by : Sh. Mukesh Khandelwal (CA) jktLo dh vksj ls@ Revenue by : Miss. Chanchal Meena (ACIT) lquokbZ dh rkjh[k@ Date of Hearing : 23/07/2020 mn?kks"k.kk dh rkjh[k@Date of Pronouncement : 23/07/2020 vkns'k@ ORDER PER: VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, A.M. This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of ld. CIT(A)-2, Jaipur dated 25.06.2019.
The ld. AR submitted that the assessee doesn’t wish to pursue the appeal in view of the fact that relief sought in the appeal has been allowed by the ld. CIT(A) vide order passed u/s 154 dated 09.03.2020 and there is thus no cause of grievance left and accordingly, the assessee may be permitted to withdraw the present appeal. 2 M/s Janta Construction Co., Jaipur vs. ACIT, Circle-04, Jaipur 3. The ld. DR was heard who did not raise any objection to the said withdrawal request on behalf of the assessee.
After hearing both the parties, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn by the assessee.
More judgments on Section 154
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Rakesh Kumar Malani, JaipurITA 1425/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Anita Sharma, JaipurITA 1344/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Ramtirath Bawa, Nagpur vs ITO Ward3(4), NagpurITA 327/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Mohinder Singh, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 3(4), NagpurITA 322/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Ramakrishna Reddy Makireddy, Hyderabad vs ACIT, Circle-5(1), HyderabadITA 70/HYD/2026[2007-08]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2007-08
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sharad Ashok Agarwal vs. State Of Maharashtra Through G.P. And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Md. Akhtar Ansari, Proprietor Of M/S Indian Associates vs. State Of Jharkhand, Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Commercial Tax Dept.Jharkhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Amarjothi Granites (INDIA) PVT. LTD., Berhampur, Ganjam vs. The Commissioner, Commercial Tax And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mishka Steels LLP And Anr. vs. The Superintendent Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Cx, Range-Ii, Behala Div. And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Gujarat Co-Operative Milk Marketing Federation Limited vs. Union Of INDIAGujarat · 14 Oct 2026