SHRI GANGA BISHAN GURJAR,TONK vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD, TONK

PDF · subscribers
ITA 305/JPR/2019Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur11 August 2020AY 2014-153 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal found that the matter was not decided on merits and the assessee deserved another opportunity. Therefore, the appeal was set aside to the CIT(A) for fresh examination after providing a reasonable opportunity.

What were the facts?

The assessee's appeal against an addition of Rs 12,17,200 under section 69A was decided ex-parte by the CIT(A) without adjudicating on merits. The assessee's representative argued that an adequate opportunity was not provided and the matter was decided summarily.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(A) provided a reasonable opportunity of being heard and decided the appeal on merits.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 69A,Section 250(6)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES ‘B’ JAIPUR

Before: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 305/JP/2019

Hearing: 11/08/2020Pronounced: 11/08/2020

आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर न्यायपीठ] जयपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES ‘B’ JAIPUR Jh fot; iky jko] U;kf;d lnL; ,oa Jh foØe flag ;kno] ys[kk lnL; ds le{k BEFORE: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 305/JP/2019 fu/kZkj.k o"kZ@Assessment Year :2014-15 cuke Shri Ganga Bishan Gurjar, ITO, Vs. S/o Sh. Dev Lal Gurjar, Ward, Near Bisalpur Project Office, Tonk Sawai Madhopur, Road, Tonk LFkk;h ys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: AOCPG2385J vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@ Assessee by : Sh. K. L. Moolchandani (CA) jktLo dh vksj ls@ Revenue by : Ms. Chanchal Meena (Addl. CIT) lquokbZ dh rkjh[k@ Date of Hearing : 11/08/2020 mn?kks"k.kk dh rkjh[k@Date of Pronouncement:11/08/2020 vkns'k@ ORDER PER: VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, A.M. This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of ld. CIT(A)-3, Jaipur dated 03.01.2019 for Assessment Year 2014-15 confirming the addition of Rs 12,17,200/- made by the Assessing officer invoking provisions of section 69A of the Act.

2.

The hearing of the matter was scheduled for today through video conferencing in view of the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic situation prevailing in the country. Shri K L Moolchandani, the authorized representative appeared on behalf of the assessee and submitted that no adequate and reasonable opportunity has been provided by the ld. CIT(A) and the appeal has been decided ex-parte qua the assessee without adjudicating the grounds of appeal Shri Ganga Bishan Gurjar, Tonk Vs. ITO, Tonk on merits. It was submitted that firstly, it was not a case of non compliance by the assessee in as much as on all the occasions, the assessee has attended the proceeding through his AR and ld. CIT(A) has also granted adjournment. Regarding non-appearance on the last date of hearing scheduled for hearing on 02.01.2019, it was submitted that the AR of the assessee, Shri Manoj Vijay did attend the office of the ld CIT(A) and appeared before the ld CIT(A) and as the assessee’s file was readily not available, the ld CIT(A) assured him that the matter will be re-fixed and he will be informed about the fresh hearing date accordingly, however, the matter was decided ex-parte very next day by the ld CIT(A). In this regard, the affidavit of Shri Manoj Vijay was also placed on record. It was further submitted that the ld. CIT(A) has also not decided the matter on merits as required u/s 250(6) of the Act. It was accordingly submitted that in the interest of substantial justice, the appeal may kindly be restored to the file of ld. CIT(A) to decide the same on merits.

3. Per contra, the ld. DR drawn our reference to the order of ld. CIT(A) and submitted that on as many as five occasions, the assessee was provided reasonable opportunity by the ld. CIT(A) but the assessee through its AR has either sought adjournment or has not been bothered to appear before the ld. CIT(A). It was accordingly submitted that more than adequate opportunity has been provided by the ld. CIT(A) and no purposes would be served in providing further opportunity to the assessee. Further, she relied on the order of the lower authorities.

4.

We have heard the rival submissions and pursued the material available on record. We find that the matter has been listed for hearing on couple of occasions by the ld CIT(A) and has been adjourned at the request of the ld AR on behalf of the assessee and again on the last date of hearing when the matter was scheduled for hearing, the ld AR did appear before the Shri Ganga Bishan Gurjar, Tonk Vs. ITO, Tonk ld CIT(A), however, the matter couldn’t be taken up due to certain administrative exigencies and thereafter, on the next day, the matter was decided ex-parte by the ld CIT(A) summarily without deciding on merits. Therefore, in the interest of justice and fair play and especially where the matter has not been decided on merits, we believe that the assessee deserves one more opportunity to put forth his arguments and contentions and we accordingly set aside the matter to the file of the ld. CIT(A) to examine the matter afresh after providing reasonable opportunity to the assessee. The assessee is also directed to appear before the ld. CIT(A) and file the necessary information and documentation in support of his contentions, as so advised and ensure in timely completion of the proceedings.

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced in the open Court on 11/08/2020.

More judgments on Section 69A

All 15,297 judgments and leading authorities on Section 69A →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →