SMT. USHA AGARWAL,JAIPUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-4, JAIPUR
In favour of the Revenue: the assessee's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that since the assessee had opted for the 'Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme', there was no subsisting cause of action for the appeal. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order passed under section 147/144 of the Income Tax Act. The assessee sought an adjournment to opt for the 'Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme-2020' to settle their tax liability.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal is maintainable when the assessee has opted for a settlement scheme like 'Vivad Se Vishwas' to resolve their tax dispute.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES,”B” JAIPUR
Before: SHRI RAMESH C SHARMA, AM & SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No.807/JP/2019
lquokbZ dh rkjh[k@ Date of Hearing : 02/09/2020 mn?kks"k.kk dh rkjh[k@Date of Pronouncement: 03/09/2020 vkns'k@ ORDER PER SANDEEP GOSAIN, J.M. The present appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order of ld.CIT (A), Ajmer dated 25.03.2019 for the Assessment Year 2009- 10 passed under section 147/144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short the ‘’Act’’). Due to prevailing COVID-19 pandemic condition, the hearing of the appeal is concluded through video conference.
The assessee has moved an application dated 01-09-2020 for seeking adjournment on the ground that the assessee has opted for “Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme-2020” to settle his tax liability with the Department. The 1 Smt. Usha Agarwal vs ACIT , Circle - 4, Jaipur Bench noted that since the assessee has already opted for resolution of dispute and tax liability under “Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme-2020”, therefore, it is not imperative to grant adjournment to the assessee. Hence, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as no cause of action subsists for maintenance of the present appeal for which the ld. DR has no objection. In view of the above facts and circumstances of the case, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed Order pronounced in the open court on 03/09/2020.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S.Surveillance System, Sambalpur vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST Odisha , CT And GST Commissionerate , Cuttack OdishaOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S.Himansu Palei vs. Assistant Commissioner Central GST CBIC Keonjhar Division, KeonjharOrissa · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S. Access Worldwide Cargo vs. The Commissioner Of CustomsKarnataka · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S Greenlam Industries LTD And Another vs. The UOI And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 3 Nov 2026
- M/S Sahoo Supply Agency,Balasore vs. Central Board Of Indirect Taxes And Customs,New DelhiOrissa · 3 Nov 2026