RADHIKA CONSTRUCTION,NARSINGHPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD, NARSINGHPUR

PDF · subscribers
ITA 85/JAB/2022Status: DisposedITAT Jabalpur14 September 2023AY 2017-183 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal directed the CIT(A) to admit the appeal and decide it on merits, considering the assessee's submissions. The CIT(A)'s order was set aside and the matter was restored for fresh adjudication.

What were the facts?

The assessee's appeal before the CIT(A) was rejected due to a delay of 481 days. The assessee claimed ignorance of online assessment procedures and difficulties in contacting their tax consultant due to the pandemic.

What were the issues?

Whether the delay in filing the appeal before the CIT(A) should be condoned due to the assessee's circumstances.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 154

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JABALPUR BENCH, JABALPUR

For Appellant: Shri M.M.Nema, Adv
For Respondent: Shri Shiv Kumar, Sr.DR
Hearing: 14/09/2023

(ASSESSMENT YEAR- 2017- 2018) Radhika Construction, vs ITO, Gandhi Ward, Main Road, Ward Narsinghpur. Kandeli, Narsinghpur, Madhya Pradesh-487001. (Appellant) (Respondent) PAN No. AAMFR6144C Assessee By Shri M.M.Nema, Adv. Revenue By Shri Shiv Kumar, Sr.DR Date of hearing 14/09/2023 Date of Pronouncement /09/2023 O R D E R PER OM PRAKASH KANT, A.M.: The appeal by the assessee is directed against the order dated 28.07.2022 passed by Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)- National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [in short “Ld.CIT(A)”] for the assessment year 2017-18, wherein Ld.CIT(A) did not condone the delay of 481 days in filing the appeal and the appeal was rejected as an unadmitted case.

2.

Before us, Ld. Counsel for the assessee has filed an affidavit from the partner of the assessee. In the said affidavit, the partner of the assessee has submitted that the assessment order was passed through electronic mode on 07.10.2019 but the assessee being unaware of the online technology of the assessment, could not access the assessment order on the Income Tax portal. Subsequently, the Assessing Officer (in short “AO”) passed order u/s 154 rectifying the assessment order on 10.02.2020, which was downloaded by the Tax Consultant only then he came to know about the assessment order through Tax Consultant Firm. He submitted that due to widespread pandemic of Corona, the assessee could not approach his Tax Consultant and therefore, there was a delay in filing the appeal.

3.

We have heard Ld. Authorized Representatives of the parties on issue in dispute and perused the material available on record. In our opinion, there exist a delay of 481 days in filing the appeal before Ld. CIT(A) and therefore, we direct Ld. CIT(A) to admit the appeal of the assessee and decide the appeal on merit after taking into consideration the submissions of the assessee. The order of Ld. CIT(A) is accordingly, set aside and the matter is restored back for deciding afresh.

4.

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced in the open Court on 14/09/2023.

More judgments on Section 154

All 8,676 judgments and leading authorities on Section 154 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →